Back

Tongue swab Mycobacterium tuberculosis qPCR for community screening of asymptomatic TB vs. clinic-based triage of symptomatic TB

Wood, R. C.; Olson, A. M.; Lochner, K. A.; Dragovich, R. B.; Ball, A.; Steadman, A.; Perumal, T.; Mendelsohn, S. C.; Mulenga, H. C.; Tameris, M.; Awany, D.; Moloantoa, T.; Malherbe, S. T.; Katona, A.; Maruri, F.; Weigel, K. M.; Noor, F.; Panchia, R.; Hlongwane, K.; Stanley, K.; van der Heijden, Y.; Hadley, K.; Walzl, G.; Scriba, T.; Martinson, N. A.; Dheda, K.; Leslie, A.; Fourie, B.; Sterling, T. R.; Cangelosi, G.; Hatherill, M.

2026-02-14 infectious diseases
10.64898/2026.02.12.26346160 medRxiv
Show abstract

BACKGROUNDDiagnostic performance of tongue swab Mycobacterium tuberculosis PCR has been evaluated for facility-based triage of symptomatic tuberculosis (TB). It is unknown whether tongue swab performance differs for detection of asymptomatic TB in community-based screening. METHODSTongue swabs were collected from adult household contacts of TB patients (HHC Cohort), and symptomatic adults presenting to clinics with presumptive TB (Clinic Cohort), at eight South African sites. TB Cases were defined by positive sputum Xpert Ultra or liquid culture, performed in all participants; and matched [~]1:3 (HHC Cohort) or [~]1:2 (Clinic Cohort) to Controls without TB. Tongue swabs in both cohorts were tested by high-volume qPCR; and in the Clinic Cohort, also by sequence-specific magnetic capture (SSMaC) with qPCR. RESULTSThe Clinic Cohort included 217 TB Cases (100% symptomatic) and 437 Controls. The HHC Cohort included 44 TB Cases (84.1% asymptomatic) and 136 Controls. In the Clinic Cohort, sensitivity of SSMaC with qPCR was 73.2% (specificity 94.6%), but not significantly higher than high-volume qPCR (63.8%; p = 0.14) (specificity 94.4%). Sensitivity of high-volume qPCR in the Clinic Cohort (63.8%) was significantly higher than the HHC Cohort (34.1%; p = 0.0007) (specificity 91.9%). Among HHC, high-volume qPCR sensitivity was 35.1% for asymptomatic TB; 52.2% for TB with abnormal CXR; and 100% for TB with High sputum Xpert Ultra grade. CONCLUSIONSSensitivity of tongue swab high-volume qPCR for community-based, household screening for asymptomatic TB was low, approximately half that of facility-based triage for symptomatic TB, but increased with radiographic severity and sputum bacillary load. Key pointsSensitivity of tongue swab high-volume qPCR for community tuberculosis screening among primarily asymptomatic household contacts was low and approximately half that of facility-based triage for symptomatic tuberculosis. Sensitivity was lowest in individuals with normal chest radiography and low bacillary burden.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.0%
2
Thorax
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.9%
3
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
120 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.2%
4
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
6.2%
5
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.2%
6
The Lancet Microbe
43 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.7%
50% of probability mass above
7
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.0%
8
New England Journal of Medicine
50 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.0%
9
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.0%
10
Emerging Infectious Diseases
103 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.5%
11
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
126 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.5%
12
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.8%
13
The Lancet Global Health
24 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
14
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 53%
1.6%
15
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.6%
16
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
39 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.6%
17
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
18
European Respiratory Journal
54 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
19
Clinical Microbiology and Infection
60 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.4%
20
The Lancet Respiratory Medicine
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.3%
21
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
22
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
23
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.1%
24
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
60 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
25
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 72%
0.9%
26
Infectious Diseases
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
27
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
28
The Lancet
16 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%