Back

Determinants of HIV Testing Uptake Among Adolescent Girls and Young Women in Mainland Tanzania: A Stratified Analysis of the 2016/17 and 2022/2023 National Surveys

Kinoko, D. W.; Kavindi, A. C.; Yuda, P.; Tibenderana, J. R.; Nyaki, A. Y.; Msuya, S. E.; Mahade, M. J.

2026-02-16 hiv aids
10.64898/2026.02.12.26346133 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundAdolescent girls and young women (AGYW) are disproportionately vulnerable to HIV. Despite expanded HIV testing services (HTS), the majority of AGYW remain unaware of their HIV status. This study aimed to assess determinants of HIV testing uptake among AGYW in mainland Tanzania before and after stratifying by age group (15-19 and 20-24 years) using data from three national surveys conducted over time. MethodologyA cross-sectional secondary data analysis was conducted using data from the Tanzania HIV Impact Surveys (2016/17 and 2022/23), obtained from the Population-based HIV Impact Assessment on 23/04/2025. Data analysis was performed using STATA version 17. Modified Poisson regression models were used to identify factors associated with HIV testing uptake before and after stratifying by age group (15-19 and 20-24 years). Results were presented using the adjusted prevalence ratio (APR) with a 95% confidence interval. ResultsHIV testing uptake among adolescents remained 40% in the years 2016/17 and 2022/23, while it increased from 86% to 90% among young women, respectively. Key factors consistently associated with higher prevalence of HIV testing uptake included being in a union, cohabiting, or formerly married; having secondary or higher education levels; and a history of sexually transmitted infections (STIs). ConclusionHIV testing uptake among AGYW in Tanzania has improved over time, with significant disparities between adolescents and young women. These findings highlight the need for age-specific strategies, intensifying adolescent-focused interventions while sustaining efforts among young women and reinforcing integrated reproductive health and HIV services.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 7%
22.3%
2
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
12.6%
3
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 2%
8.3%
4
Sexually Transmitted Infections
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.1%
50% of probability mass above
5
AIDS and Behavior
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.8%
6
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.1%
7
Journal of the International AIDS Society
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
8
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
9
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.0%
10
AIDS
31 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.0%
11
JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes
19 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.4%
12
IJID Regions
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
13
BMJ Global Health
98 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
14
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
15
Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
16
Tropical Medicine & International Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
17
BMJ Public Health
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
18
The Lancet Global Health
24 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.2%
19
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
20
Infectious Diseases of Poverty
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
21
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
22
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
23
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
126 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
24
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
25
International Journal of Medical Informatics
25 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%