Back

Detection-Guided Artifact Removal for Clinical EEG: A Deep Learning Framework

Nyanney, E.; Thirumala, P.; Visweswaran, S.; Zhaohui, G.

2026-03-03 neurology
10.64898/2026.02.12.26346128 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectiveWe developed and validated a detection-guided artifact removal framework for clinical electroencephalography (EEG). It corrects only the contaminated segments and preserves artifact-free data. ApproachThe framework employs convolutional neural network (CNN) detectors trained on the Temple University Hospital (TUH) Artifact Corpus of 150 recordings from 105 patients. For eye movement artifacts (20 second windows), it uses independent component analysis (ICA) and canonical correlation analysis (CCA). For muscle artifacts (5 second windows), it employs wavelet thresholding and empirical mode decomposition (EMD). For non-physiological artifacts (1 second windows), it utilizes spherical spline interpolation and artifact subspace reconstruction (ASR). Removal is applied exclusively to detector-flagged windows, and unflagged windows remain unchanged. In a held-out test set of 21 patients and 30 recordings, we compared selective and global removal using correlation, root mean squared error (RMSE), and peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR). Main resultsSelective removal outperformed global removal in all six methods and 18 metric comparisons, with a p-value of less than 10-105. Selective processing maintained a clean-segment correlation above 0.987, whereas global removal reduced the correlation to values as low as 0.39 for CCA and 0.47 for ASR. CCA removed 74.6% of the eye movement artifact amplitude, EMD removed 99.8% of the high-frequency (30-40 Hz) muscle contamination, and ASR reduced the non-physiological artifact amplitude by 37.1%. The preservation of artifact-free windows remained high for all methods and indicated minimal distortion of the clean EEG. SignificanceDetection-guided selective removal addresses a significant limitation of global correction pipelines that can remove clean EEG signals. This framework automates artifact removal without manual review and preserves the signal fidelity for clinical interpretation. Its modular design facilitates integration into real-time monitoring systems for acute and perioperative care.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.