Back

The Effect Of Smokers Transitioning To E-Cigarettes On Physical And Mental Health: An Emulated Trial Using Longitudinal Data.

Thameemul Ansari, S. J.; Katikireddi, S. V.; Kopasker, D.

2026-02-22 epidemiology
10.64898/2026.02.12.26345898 medRxiv
Show abstract

IntroductionTobacco smoking remains a leading cause of preventable death in the UK. Although e-cigarettes are promoted as a harm-reduction option, longitudinal evidence on short-term health outcomes across different smoking transition pathways is limited. This study examined short-term associations between transitions to exclusive e-cigarette use, dual use, or cessation and physical health, mental health, and health-related quality of life, compared with continued smoking. MethodsA target trial emulation framework was applied to Waves 7-14 (2015-2024) of the UK Household Longitudinal Study, including 18,011 participant-wave observations from baseline smokers. Propensity score matching (1:3) was used to create comparable exposure groups. A doubly robust analysis-combining matching with Ordinary Least Squares regression-estimated outcomes using the SF-12 Physical (PCS) and Mental (MCS) Component Summary scores and a mapped EuroQol 5-Dimensions 3-Level version (EQ-5D-3L) index. The SF-12 is a validated generic health measure, where PCS and MCS are norm-based scores (mean = 50, SD = 10). The EQ-5D-3L index (range: 0 to 1) reflects overall health utility. ResultsCompared with continued smokers, exclusive e-cigarette users had higher short-term mental health scores (SF-12 MCS {beta} = 1.042; 95% CI: 0.229 to 1.855). In contrast, dual users had lower mental health scores ({beta} = -1.023; 95% CI: -1.574 to -0.472). Short-term physical health scores (SF-12 PCS) were lower among both exclusive switchers ({beta} = -0.670; 95% CI: - 1.287 to -0.053) and quitters ({beta} = -0.486; 95% CI: -0.853 to -0.119), with no evidence of short-term physical health improvement for any transition group. Dual users also had lower health-related quality of life (EQ-5D-3L {beta} = -0.016; 95% CI: -0.025 to -0.008). Subgroup analyses suggested heterogeneity by age and socioeconomic position, with poorer outcomes among older and more disadvantaged smokers. Sensitivity analyses produced directionally consistent findings. ConclusionExclusive switching to e-cigarettes was associated with higher short-term mental health scores, whereas dual use was associated with poorer mental health and health-related quality of life. These findings underscore the importance of distinguishing complete switching from dual use when designing harm-reduction policies and smoking cessation support.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Addiction
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
26.3%
2
Nicotine & Tobacco Research
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.9%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 33%
4.4%
4
Drug and Alcohol Dependence
37 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.0%
50% of probability mass above
5
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.1%
6
American Journal of Epidemiology
57 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.8%
7
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.6%
8
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
9
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
10
Epidemiology
26 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
11
Preventive Medicine Reports
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
12
Preventive Medicine
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
13
American Journal of Preventive Medicine
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
14
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 66%
1.2%
15
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.1%
16
Thorax
32 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
17
JMIR mHealth and uHealth
10 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
18
Psychological Medicine
74 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
19
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 62%
0.8%
20
International Journal of Drug Policy
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
21
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
22
Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety
13 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
23
Nicotine and Tobacco Research
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
24
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
28 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
25
The British Journal of Psychiatry
21 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
26
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
27
The Lancet Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
28
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
29
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.5%
30
ERJ Open Research
44 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%