Back

Spatial bias in GBIF data has limited impact on plant climate niche properties in Europe

Coquery, T.; Welk, E.; Korell, L.

2026-02-12 ecology
10.64898/2026.02.11.705286 bioRxiv
Show abstract

AimThe Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF) is the most prominent source of species occurrence data for modeling climate niches, but exhibits strong unevenness in its data coverage across different geographic regions. The impact of this spatial bias on the reliability of GBIF-based plant climate niches in Europe remains unexplored. This study aims to address this gap, and to investigate whether the targeted integration of additional atlas data can reduce the potential impact of the spatial bias. LocationEurope. Time period1950s - 2024 Major taxa studiedEuropean grassland plant species. MethodsWe analyzed the climate niches of a large number of grassland species, with diverse distribution patterns across Europe, based on a) GBIF and b) on an enriched version of GBIF with national atlas data from Eastern European countries (GBIF+), where data coverage is currently low in GBIF. We followed best practices in niche characterization, particularly by performing environmental subsampling. The accuracy in climate niche properties was determined by comparing niches based on GBIF and GBIF+ data with niches based on a careful implementation of expert range maps as reference dataset. We focused on niche optimum position and niche similarity. Additionally, we investigated how biogeographical indicators can predict variability in climate niche accuracy. ResultsMost species exhibited reliable climate niche characterization using GBIF data, especially for widely distributed species. Yet, reliability decreased with continentality; that is, when species were primarily distributed in Eastern Europe. Integrating additional data did not significantly reduce this bias in niche characterization. Main conclusionsDespite the spatial bias in its records, GBIF can be used to reliably characterize the climate niches of many species in Europe if uneven sampling effort is accounted for. The laborious integration of additional data to address spatial bias does not yield the desired increase in niche reliability.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Global Ecology and Biogeography
41 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.5%
2
Ecography
50 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.1%
3
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
8.3%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 35%
4.1%
5
Diversity and Distributions
26 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.9%
6
Journal of Biogeography
37 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
7
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 41%
3.5%
50% of probability mass above
8
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.7%
9
Ecological Indicators
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.7%
10
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
11
Global Change Biology
69 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.4%
12
Journal of Environmental Management
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.3%
13
Biological Conservation
43 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.3%
14
Basic and Applied Ecology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.0%
15
Ecological Informatics
29 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
16
PLANTS, PEOPLE, PLANET
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
17
Landscape Ecology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
18
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
19
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
20
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 60%
1.7%
21
Environmental Research Letters
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
22
Scientific Data
174 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
23
Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
24
Conservation Biology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
25
Communications Earth & Environment
14 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
26
Conservation Science and Practice
13 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
27
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
28
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
29
American Journal of Botany
41 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
30
Biotropica
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%