Neurocognitive deficits, psychotrauma, and inflammation shape major depressive disorder and its phenome features
Wang, X.; Wang, P.; Niu, M.; Yangyang, C.; Almulla, A. F.; Chen, C.; Li, J.; Zhang, Y.; Maes, M.
Show abstract
BackgroundMajor depressive disorder (MDD) involves immune-metabolic dysregulation, psychosocial adversity, and multidomain cognitive disturbances, yet single cognitive indices often show small and inconsistent effects. We derived a multivariate Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery (CANTAB)-based cognitive phenotype ("cognitype") and tested whether it adds explanatory value beyond adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) and an acute-phase protein (APP) index in acute-phase MDD. MethodsEighty-seven acute-phase MDD patients and 40 healthy controls completed CANTAB testing; key outcomes from DMS, RVP, OTS, and ERT were summarized as a cognitype score (PC1). ACEs were assessed, and peripheral inflammatory markers were combined into an APP index. Logistic and multiple regression models tested discrimination between MDD and controls and prediction of multidimensional phenome features (affective, physio-somatic, vegetative, recurrence-related, personality, and suicidality domains). ResultsIndividual CANTAB outcomes showed limited between-group differences after FDR correction, but multivariable models integrating cognitive measures with ACEs and APP robustly discriminated MDD from controls (AUC up to 0.907). The cognitype independently predicted multiple phenome domains when modeled alongside ACEs and APP, and their combined effects explained [~]40-55% of variance across symptom dimensions. ConclusionA data-driven cognitype derived from core CANTAB tasks captures clinically meaningful cognitive variation in acute-phase MDD and contributes significant predictive value beyond psychosocial adversity and inflammatory activation. Integrating cognition, ACEs, and inflammation improves characterization of symptom heterogeneity and supports precision approaches targeting neurocognitive-immune-environmental mechanisms.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Disorder-and cognitive demand-specific neurofunctional alterations during social emotional working memory in generalized anxiety disorder and major depressive disorder 96%
- Which traits predict elevated distress during the Covid-19 pandemic? Results from a large, longitudinal cohort study with psychiatric patients and healthy controls 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Using Major Depression Polygenic Risk Scores to Explore the Depressive Symptom Continuum 96%
- Major depression symptom severity associations with willingness to exert effort and patch foraging strategy 96%
- Effective connectivity during faces processing in major depression – distinguishing markers of pathology, risk, and resilience 95%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- The Influence of Phenotyping Method on Structural Neuroimaging Associations with Depression in UK Biobank 96%
- Neurovegetative symptom subtypes in young people with major depressive disorder and their structural brain correlates 96%
- Acylcarnitines metabolism in depression: association with diagnostic status, depression severity and symptom profile in the NESDA cohort 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Metabolomic and Inflammatory Signatures of Symptom Dimensions in Major Depression 96%
- Clenbuterol Attenuates Immune Reaction to Lipopolysaccharide and Its Relationship to Anhedonia in Adolescents 94%
- Reverse cholesterol transport and lipid peroxidation biomarkers in major depression and bipolar disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.