Back

Federated penalized piecewise exponential model for horizontally distributed survival data: FedPPEM

Islam, N.; Luo, C.; Tong, J.; Polleya, D. A.; Jordan, C. T.; Haverkos, B.; Bair, S.; Kent, A.; Weller, G.

2026-02-12 health informatics
10.64898/2026.02.11.26346054 medRxiv
Show abstract

Cox proportional hazard regressions are frequently employed to develop prognostic models for time-to-event data, considering both patient-specific and disease-specific characteristics. In high-dimensional clinical modeling, these biological features can exhibit high collinearity due to inter-feature relationships, potentially causing instability and numerical issues during estimation without regularization. For rare diseases such as acute myeloid leukemia (AML), the sparsity and scarcity of data further complicate estimation. In such cases, data augmentation through multi-site collaboration can alleviate these problems. However, this often necessitates sharing individual patient data (IPD) across sites, which presents challenges due to regulatory barriers aimed at protecting patient privacy. To overcome these challenges, we propose a privacy-preserving algorithm that eliminates sharing IPD across sites and fits a federated penalized piecewise exponential model (FedPPEM) to estimate potential effects of clinical features using summary statistics. This algorithm yields results nearly identical to those from pooled IPD, including effect size and standard error estimates. We demonstrate the models performance in quantifying effects of clinical features and genetic risk classification on overall survival using real-world data from [~]1200 newly diagnosed AML patients across 33 U.S. sites. Although applied in AML context, this model is disease-agnostic and can be implemented in other diseases and clinical contexts.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.