Back

Digital Adherence Support for Tuberculosis Treatment: A Multicentre Randomized Trial in Kenya

Yoeli, E.; Rathauser, J.; Nyakan, E.; Boutilier, J. J.; Campbell, J. R.; Chilo, M.; Irungu, L. M.; Jonasson, J. O.; Kimenye, M. K.; Muchiri, F. K.; Mwikamba, A. M.; Ochieng, T. A.; Ondigo, J.; Owiti, P.; Schwartzman, K.; Rand, D. G.

2026-02-14 infectious diseases
10.64898/2026.02.11.26346015 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundImproving tuberculosis (TB) treatment success is critical for improving the health of individuals with TB, reducing transmission, and lowering treatment costs. We conducted a four-arm randomized controlled trial (RCT) to evaluate whether three digital interventions with increasing support improved treatment outcomes compared to the standard of care. MethodsIn this open-label, parallel RCT in Kenya, all TB patients at 902 participating clinics who had at least 2 months of treatment remaining were eligible for inclusion. Individuals were centrally randomized at a ratio of 4:3:12:12 into a control group that received only the standard of care, or one of the following three intervention groups that received the standard of care plus: (1) a daily SMS medication adherence reminder ( SMS); (2) access to a platform that sent a daily request for self-verification of medication adherence and provided disease information, motivational messages, and an adherence game ( platform); and (3) access to a platform with these same features, plus support from a team of trained supporters ( Keheala). The primary outcomes were: the proportion of individuals who experienced an unsuccessful treatment outcome (a composite of: died, failed treatment, or loss to follow-up), and loss to follow-up (LTFU). The secondary outcome was medication non-adherence, measured via unannounced urine isoniazid tests for a random sample of 731 individuals in the control and Keheala groups. ResultsBetween April 13, 2018 and December 20, 2019, 16,753 individuals were randomized, yielding 14,962 in the mITT population: 1,997 in the control, 1,475 in SMS, 6,057 in platform, and 5,433 in Keheala. Absolute risk of unsuccessful outcomes was 12.4% in the control group. It was reduced by 1.9 percentage points in the SMS group (95% C.I.: -0.1-4.0), 1.9 percentage points in the platform group (95% C.I.: 0.3-3.4), and 2.6 percentage points in the Keheala group (95% C.I.: 1.0-4.2); mostly due to reductions in LTFU. Medication non-adherence was 12.4% in the control group. It was reduced by 7.5 percentage points in the Keheala group (95% C.I.: 2.6-12.5). ConclusionsAll digital health interventions improved treatment outcomes. The Keheala intervention also reduced medication non-adherence. The interventions could be considered as a supplement to the standard of care, especially in resource-constrained regions where in-person support is impractical.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.4%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 19%
10.1%
3
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
10.1%
4
BMJ Global Health
98 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
7.2%
5
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
6.3%
6
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.0%
50% of probability mass above
7
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.0%
8
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
71 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.6%
9
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.1%
10
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
11
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 48%
1.9%
12
BMJ
49 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.8%
13
BMC Medical Research Methodology
43 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.8%
14
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.7%
15
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
16
Healthcare
16 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.3%
17
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 64%
1.3%
18
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
19
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
126 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
20
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
21
The Lancet Global Health
24 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
22
Trials
25 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
23
Clinical Microbiology and Infection
60 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
24
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
25
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
26
European Respiratory Journal
54 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
27
The Lancet
16 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%
28
Epidemiology
26 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.6%
29
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.6%
30
American Journal of Epidemiology
57 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%