Back

Digital Adherence Support for Tuberculosis Treatment: A Multicentre Randomized Trial in Kenya

Yoeli, E.; Rathauser, J.; Nyakan, E.; Boutilier, J. J.; Campbell, J. R.; Chilo, M.; Irungu, L. M.; Jonasson, J. O.; Kimenye, M. K.; Muchiri, F. K.; Mwikamba, A. M.; Ochieng, T. A.; Ondigo, J.; Owiti, P.; Schwartzman, K.; Rand, D. G.

2026-02-14 infectious diseases
10.64898/2026.02.11.26346015 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundImproving tuberculosis (TB) treatment success is critical for improving the health of individuals with TB, reducing transmission, and lowering treatment costs. We conducted a four-arm randomized controlled trial (RCT) to evaluate whether three digital interventions with increasing support improved treatment outcomes compared to the standard of care. MethodsIn this open-label, parallel RCT in Kenya, all TB patients at 902 participating clinics who had at least 2 months of treatment remaining were eligible for inclusion. Individuals were centrally randomized at a ratio of 4:3:12:12 into a control group that received only the standard of care, or one of the following three intervention groups that received the standard of care plus: (1) a daily SMS medication adherence reminder ( SMS); (2) access to a platform that sent a daily request for self-verification of medication adherence and provided disease information, motivational messages, and an adherence game ( platform); and (3) access to a platform with these same features, plus support from a team of trained supporters ( Keheala). The primary outcomes were: the proportion of individuals who experienced an unsuccessful treatment outcome (a composite of: died, failed treatment, or loss to follow-up), and loss to follow-up (LTFU). The secondary outcome was medication non-adherence, measured via unannounced urine isoniazid tests for a random sample of 731 individuals in the control and Keheala groups. ResultsBetween April 13, 2018 and December 20, 2019, 16,753 individuals were randomized, yielding 14,962 in the mITT population: 1,997 in the control, 1,475 in SMS, 6,057 in platform, and 5,433 in Keheala. Absolute risk of unsuccessful outcomes was 12.4% in the control group. It was reduced by 1.9 percentage points in the SMS group (95% C.I.: -0.1-4.0), 1.9 percentage points in the platform group (95% C.I.: 0.3-3.4), and 2.6 percentage points in the Keheala group (95% C.I.: 1.0-4.2); mostly due to reductions in LTFU. Medication non-adherence was 12.4% in the control group. It was reduced by 7.5 percentage points in the Keheala group (95% C.I.: 2.6-12.5). ConclusionsAll digital health interventions improved treatment outcomes. The Keheala intervention also reduced medication non-adherence. The interventions could be considered as a supplement to the standard of care, especially in resource-constrained regions where in-person support is impractical.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.