Back

Assessment of Environmental DNA Surveys for the Cryptic Salamander Mussel (Simpsonaias ambigua)

Marshall, N. T.; Berg, N.; Mullins, T.; Stahlman, C.; Dean, C.; Sierra, M.; Fleece, W. C.

2026-02-12 ecology
10.64898/2026.02.10.705175 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Simpsonaias ambigua (Salamander Mussel), is a small and thin shelled freshwater mussel often found in difficult to survey habitats, such as beneath slab stones, in the crevices of rock walls, or buried within roots of emergent vegetation and in undercuts of banks. The use of environmental DNA (eDNA - genetic material released from urine, waste, mucus, or sloughed cells) sampling may improve detection and assessment of presence / absence for this rare mussel in comparison to visual tactile techniques. This study completed side by side comparisons of traditional mussel searches and eDNA for a direct assessment of mussel detection efficiencies. Surveying was conducted in several waterbodies of different habitat characteristics with varying abundances of S. ambigua. Additionally, a broad assessment of S. ambigua presence was conducted throughout the proposed critical habitat reach of the Blanchard River in northwest Ohio, to assess if the species remained extant. All eDNA samples were also assessed for the presence of Necturus maculosus (Mudpuppy), the obligate host species for S. ambigua. The eDNA sampling successfully detected S. ambigua from multiple sites and watersheds where it was found with visual surveys. In some cases, eDNA detections occurred in locations where over 16 hours of search yielded only a single individual or fresh dead shells, supporting the sensitivity of eDNA for detection of rare species. Furthermore, probability of detection analysis suggests eDNA sampling can provide high detection efficiency with relatively low effort in comparison to visual searches. The development and validation of an eDNA protocol for the simultaneous detection of S. ambigua and its host salamander increases survey efficiency, reduces field costs, and can support future conservation efforts for listing drainages of extant populations and monitoring conservation goals.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 1%
39.9%
2
Environmental DNA
49 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.3%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 27%
4.4%
50% of probability mass above
4
Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
5
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.6%
6
Global Ecology and Conservation
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.6%
7
Frontiers in Marine Science
55 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.1%
8
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.1%
9
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.6%
10
PLOS Water
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
11
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
12
Limnology and Oceanography: Methods
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
13
Ecosphere
53 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
14
Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.2%
15
Biological Conservation
43 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
16
Journal of Environmental Management
11 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
17
Journal of Fish Biology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
18
Environmental Pollution
35 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
19
Molecular Ecology Resources
161 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
20
FACETS
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
21
Freshwater Biology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
22
Biological Invasions
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
23
Hydrobiologia
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
24
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.5%