Back

Wax-printing-free fabrication of paper-supported 3D cancer cell culture

Kumar, A.; Toley, B. J.

2026-02-12 bioengineering
10.64898/2026.02.10.705119 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Three-dimensional (3D) in vitro tumor models are critical for studying transport-limited drug efficacy in solid tumors; however, many existing platforms are technically complex and remain difficult to access. Stacked paper-based tumor models ("cells-in-gel-in-paper", CiGiP) address this challenge by enabling formation of diffusion-limited microenvironments while allowing direct access to cells from distinct tissue depths. Nevertheless, current CiGiP implementations rely on wax or hydrophobic barrier patterning of paper, which has become increasingly inaccessible. Here, we present a wax-printing-free approach for fabricating stacked paper-supported 3D tumor tissues using a simple 3D-printed press-fit enclosure that holds circular paper layers snugly together, thereby enforcing one-dimensional transport without lateral leakage. Using MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells embedded in Matrigel, we demonstrate the formation of nutrient-limited microenvironments across the tissue depth, as evidenced by layer-dependent cell viability. The platform enables direct quantification of spatial and temporal drug responses, demonstrated using doxorubicin and paclitaxel, both individually and in combination. Layer-dependent cytotoxicity was measured, and combination treatment analysis revealed antagonistic interactions consistent with prior reports. By eliminating the need for hydrophobic patterning, this approach substantially lowers the technical barriers to constructing stacked paper tumor models and is expected to facilitate broader adoption of paper-supported 3D tissues for drug screening and mechanistic studies. Graphical Abstract O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=77 SRC="FIGDIR/small/705119v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (23K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@55f56aorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1633288org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@18aae9eorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1ce1532_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Advanced Materials
53 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.5%
2
Advanced Healthcare Materials
71 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
10.3%
3
Advanced Materials Technologies
27 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.0%
4
Advanced Functional Materials
41 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.7%
5
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 3%
6.2%
50% of probability mass above
6
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
39 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.2%
7
Lab on a Chip
88 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.8%
8
Biofabrication
32 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.9%
9
Small
70 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
10
Bioactive Materials
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.7%
11
ACS Applied Bio Materials
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
12
ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering
37 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
13
Small Methods
26 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
14
Analytical Chemistry
205 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
15
Biomaterials Science
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
16
Materials Today Bio
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
17
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 25%
0.9%
18
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 58%
0.9%
19
Angewandte Chemie International Edition
81 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
20
Bioengineering & Translational Medicine
21 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
21
Advanced Materials Interfaces
10 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
22
ACS Omega
90 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%