Back

Insights on Human Dimensions of Freshwater Fish Conservation in Jharkhand and Bihar, India

Das, P.; Binoy, V. V.

2026-02-11 ecology
10.64898/2026.02.10.705004 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Conservation outcomes in the socio-economically disadvantaged regions are strongly influenced by human behaviour, social norms, and existing governance mechanisms. This study examined stakeholder attitudes, perceptions, values, norms and decision-making processes associated with the conservation of freshwater fishes in two neighbouring states in Eastern India - Jharkhand and Bihar. An approach integrating the Conservation Planning Framework (CPF) with the Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB) and Social Values (SV) enabled the development of four interlinked themes: "livelihood and economic prioritisation over conservation", "constraints on participation", "values and conservation willingness" and "erosion of social and cultural memories of mahseer", indicative of a process of dual extinction faced by these iconic freshwater fishes. Despite the widespread positive attitudes of the stakeholders towards native fishes and freshwater ecosystems, conservation intentions and actions in both states were found to be negatively influenced by feeble communication, prioritisation of aquaculture, institutional rigidity, inadequate conservation education, limited actual behavioural control (ABC) and subjective norms-driven livelihood pressures. However, the presence of active fishermen cooperative societies and stronger relational values among the local communities makes Jharkhand better equipped to implement participatory governance and stakeholder-involved conservation engagement plans. By strategically linking CPF, TPB, and SV, this study demonstrates how human attitudes, behaviour, social norms, and institutional structures interact to shape freshwater fish conservation outcomes in regions where livelihood needs intersect with conservation priorities, thereby offering actionable insights for managing the native freshwater fish diversity.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 1%
38.0%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 18%
6.4%
3
Global Ecology and Conservation
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.9%
4
Conservation Letters
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.4%
50% of probability mass above
5
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.2%
6
Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
7
Conservation Science and Practice
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.3%
8
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.1%
9
Journal of Environmental Management
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.7%
10
Biological Conservation
43 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.9%
11
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
12
Animals
20 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
13
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
60 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
14
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
15
Biodiversity and Conservation
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.2%
16
One Health
29 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.1%
17
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
18
Ecological Indicators
20 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
19
Ecological Informatics
29 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
20
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
21
Frontiers in Veterinary Science
30 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
22
Environmental Pollution
35 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
23
Environmental Research Letters
15 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.5%
24
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.5%
25
Animal Conservation
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.5%