Back

Validation of the ESC 0/3h-Algorithm with a Novel High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin I Assay in Patients with Suspected Myocardial Infarction

Durak, K.; Lopez-Ayala, P.; Koechlin, L.; Boeddinghaus, J.; Strebel, I.; Messingschlager, S.; Champetier, A.; Kaplan, E.; Herraiz-Recuenco, L.; Miro, O.; Christ, M.; Keller, D. I.; Martin-Sanchez, F. J.; Morawiec, B.; Parenica, J.; Hure, G.; Freihofer, T. J.; Wildi, K.; Bima, P.; Crisanti, L.; Stolte, T.; Potlukova, E.; Gualandro, D. M.; Mahfoud, F.; Mueller, C.

2026-02-24 emergency medicine
10.64898/2026.02.10.26346042 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundThere is uncertainty among physicians regarding the optimal clinical application of the novel high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I (hs-cTnI)-VITROS assay within the widely implemented upper reference limit (URL)-based ESC 0/3h-algorithm. MethodsThis prospective, international, multicenter study aimed to validate and compare different modifications of the URL-based ESC 0/3h-algorithm among adult patients presenting with suspected acute myocardial infarction (AMI) to the emergency department. Final diagnoses of AMI were centrally adjudicated by two independent cardiologists, blinded to hs-cTnI-VITROS concentrations. Discrimination was compared to the best validated hs-cTnT/I-assays. Clinical follow-up for cardiovascular death and AMI was conducted until five years. ResultsAmong 1225 eligible patients (median age 63 years (IQR 52-75), 31.9% women), 18.9% were adjudicated as NSTEMI. Diagnostic discrimination of hs-cTnI-VITROS at 0h was very high (AUC 0.949, 95% CI 0.941-0.958), and comparable to hs-cTnI-Architect and hs-cTnT-Elecsys. Using the ESC 0/3h algorithm, 30.9% of patients were classified as rule-out (sensitivity 99.1%, NPV 99.5%) and 19.0% as rule-in (specificity 96.0%, PPV 82.8%). Substituting the HEART score for the GRACE score increased rule-out efficacy to 43.9%, while maintaining very high safety (sensitivity 99.6%; NPV 99.8%). Findings were consistent across predefined subgroups, in sensitivity analyses restricted to type 1 NSTEMI, using the 2h study blood sample (n=2249), and for the composite of cardiovascular death or AMI during five-year follow-up. ConclusionsThe ESC 0/3h-algorithm demonstrated excellent performance for rule-out of NSTEMI with greater efficacy when combined with the HEART-instead of the GRACE score. Registrationhttps://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT00470587 Clinical PerspectiveO_ST_ABSWhat Is New?C_ST_ABSO_LIIn a prospective, international multicenter cohort, the URL-based ESC 0/3h algorithm using the FDA-cleared hs-cTnI-VITROS assay achieved very high rule-out safety (sensitivity 99.1%, NPV 99.5%) but limited efficacy (30.9% rule-out) when combined with GRACE score <140 and symptom resolution. C_LIO_LIReplacing GRACE with a HEART score (<5) increased rule-out efficacy to 43.9% while maintaining excellent safety (sensitivity 99.6%, NPV 99.8%), with consistent findings across subgroups, sensitivity analyses, and long-term outcomes. C_LI What Are the Clinical Implications?O_LIClinicians and health systems using hs-cTnI-VITROS can apply the ESC 0/3h algorithm with assay-conform decision values; adding clinical risk stratification is necessary to meet contemporary rule-out safety targets. C_LI

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.