Back

Factors associated with contraceptive use among reproductive-age women during a pandemic: Evidence from a small developing state

George, C.; Harewood, H.; Campbell, M.; Singh, K.; Augustus, E. H.

2026-02-12 sexual and reproductive health
10.64898/2026.02.10.26346030 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic disrupted access to sexual and reproductive health (SRH) services, including contraception. Understanding contraceptive use during this period is critical for strengthening health system resilience in small developing states. ObjectiveTo identify factors associated with contraceptive use among reproductive-age women during the COVID-19 pandemic in Barbados. MethodsA cross-sectional online survey was conducted in Barbados between April 28 and May 3, 2020 among adults aged [&ge;]18 years. This analysis is restricted to women aged 18-49 years. Current contraceptive use (yes/no) was assessed among non-pregnant respondents. Associations with sociodemographic factors, relationship status, and psychosocial distress (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale [HADS] were examined using bivariate tests and logistic regression. Variables, alcohol and marijuana use had >15% missing data which limited. ResultsA total of 1,094 women aged 18-49 years completed the survey and were included in descriptive analyses. At the time of the survey, 2.7% (n=29) reported being pregnant and 7.3% (n=80) reported not being pregnant but planning pregnancy; the majority 89.7%, (n=981) were neither pregnant nor planning pregnancy. Among non-pregnant women with contraceptive data, 34.2% (n=333) reported current contraceptive use. Moderate-to-severe anxiety symptoms were reported by 36.5%, and moderate or clinically significant global distress by 39.0%. Contraceptive use was significantly associated with HADS anxiety (p=0.021) and HADS global distress (p=0.016), but not depression (p=0.211). Women who were partnered (p=0.014) or married/cohabitating (p<0.001) were more likely to report contraceptive use compared with single women. University education was strongly associated with contraceptive use (p<0.001). Women aged 26 - 39 years were more likely to use contraception relative to those aged 40 - 49 years, while women aged 18 - 25 years were less likely. ConclusionsDuring the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic in Barbados, contraceptive use among non-pregnant reproductive-age women was associated with psychosocial distress (especially anxiety), relationship status, education, and age. Emergency preparedness in small developing states should prioritize continuity of SRH services, mental health integration, and access to self-managed contraceptive options.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
19.7%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 9%
18.9%
3
Sexually Transmitted Infections
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.5%
4
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.9%
5
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 6%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
6
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
7
SSM - Population Health
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
8
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.8%
9
Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.6%
10
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 46%
2.5%
11
BMJ Global Health
98 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.4%
12
Nature Human Behaviour
85 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
13
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
2.1%
14
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
15
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
16
Social Science & Medicine
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
17
Health Expectations
12 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
18
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
19
Journal of the International AIDS Society
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
20
Tropical Medicine & International Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
21
Archives of Clinical and Biomedical Research
28 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
22
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
23
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
24
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
25
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
26
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
27
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
28
European Journal of Human Genetics
49 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
29
Viruses
318 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.5%