Back

A custom phenotypic profile for Fanconi anemia: Addressing gaps in existing disease annotations

Connelly, E.; Laraway, B.; Mullen, K. R.; Mungall, C. J.; Haendel, M. A.; Hurwitz, E.

2026-02-12 genetic and genomic medicine
10.64898/2026.02.10.26346018 medRxiv
Show abstract

Fanconi anemia (FA) is a rare genetic disorder of impaired DNA repair characterized by progressive bone marrow failure, congenital malformations, and cancer predisposition. Early identification of individuals with FA is critical for timely clinical management, yet phenotype-driven approaches to FA identification are hindered by inconsistencies in existing phenotypic profiles. We compared the Human Phenotype Ontology (HPO) annotations for FA in OMIM (215 terms across 22 complementation group entries) and Orphanet (106 terms in a single entry, ORPHA:84), quantifying overlap and anatomical system coverage. To address identified gaps, we developed a comprehensive custom HPO profile by extracting phenotypic terms from the entire Fanconi Cancer Foundation (FCF) Clinical Care Guidelines using OntoGPT, an LLM-based ontology extraction tool, followed by manual curation to ensure accuracy and clinical relevance. OMIM and Orphanet shared only 36 HPO terms (12.6% of their combined 285 unique terms), demonstrating substantial discordance. Our custom profile comprises 264 unique HPO terms, of which 161 (61.0%) are novel and not present in either existing source. The novel terms expand coverage particularly in musculoskeletal (39 terms, 23.8%), genitourinary (26 terms, 15.9%), limb (26 terms, 15.9%), head or neck (20 terms 12.2%), and digestive system (17 terms, 10.4%) phenotypes. Community-curated phenotypic profiles derived from clinical practice guidelines can substantially augment existing disease annotations. Our FA profile, the most comprehensive HPO-based phenotypic characterization of FA to date, is publicly available and provides a foundation for improved clinical decision support and EHR-based computable phenotyping that can accelerate diagnosis for individuals with FA. Furthermore, the LLM-assisted approach offers generalizable methods to improve the diagnostic odyssey for all rare diseases.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Genetics in Medicine
69 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.3%
2
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
14.9%
3
Human Mutation
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.0%
4
The American Journal of Human Genetics
206 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.7%
5
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.7%
50% of probability mass above
6
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
61 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.7%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 52%
2.0%
8
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
9
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 49%
1.8%
10
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
11
Genetics in Medicine Open
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
12
BMC Medical Genomics
36 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
13
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.5%
14
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 56%
1.5%
15
The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics
36 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.4%
16
Cell Genomics
162 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.4%
17
Human Genetics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.4%
18
European Journal of Human Genetics
49 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.1%
19
Journal of Clinical Investigation
164 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
20
Human Molecular Genetics
130 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
21
Rheumatology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
22
British Journal of Haematology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
23
Blood
67 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
24
GENETICS
189 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
25
Med
38 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
26
Bioinformatics Advances
184 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
27
npj Genomic Medicine
33 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
28
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
29
Ophthalmology Science
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.5%
30
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
29 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%