A custom phenotypic profile for Fanconi anemia: Addressing gaps in existing disease annotations
Connelly, E.; Laraway, B.; Mullen, K. R.; Mungall, C. J.; Haendel, M. A.; Hurwitz, E.
Show abstract
Fanconi anemia (FA) is a rare genetic disorder of impaired DNA repair characterized by progressive bone marrow failure, congenital malformations, and cancer predisposition. Early identification of individuals with FA is critical for timely clinical management, yet phenotype-driven approaches to FA identification are hindered by inconsistencies in existing phenotypic profiles. We compared the Human Phenotype Ontology (HPO) annotations for FA in OMIM (215 terms across 22 complementation group entries) and Orphanet (106 terms in a single entry, ORPHA:84), quantifying overlap and anatomical system coverage. To address identified gaps, we developed a comprehensive custom HPO profile by extracting phenotypic terms from the entire Fanconi Cancer Foundation (FCF) Clinical Care Guidelines using OntoGPT, an LLM-based ontology extraction tool, followed by manual curation to ensure accuracy and clinical relevance. OMIM and Orphanet shared only 36 HPO terms (12.6% of their combined 285 unique terms), demonstrating substantial discordance. Our custom profile comprises 264 unique HPO terms, of which 161 (61.0%) are novel and not present in either existing source. The novel terms expand coverage particularly in musculoskeletal (39 terms, 23.8%), genitourinary (26 terms, 15.9%), limb (26 terms, 15.9%), head or neck (20 terms 12.2%), and digestive system (17 terms, 10.4%) phenotypes. Community-curated phenotypic profiles derived from clinical practice guidelines can substantially augment existing disease annotations. Our FA profile, the most comprehensive HPO-based phenotypic characterization of FA to date, is publicly available and provides a foundation for improved clinical decision support and EHR-based computable phenotyping that can accelerate diagnosis for individuals with FA. Furthermore, the LLM-assisted approach offers generalizable methods to improve the diagnostic odyssey for all rare diseases.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Towards robust clinical genome interpretation: developing a consistent terminology to characterize disease-gene relationships - allelic requirement, inheritance modes and disease mechanisms 93%
- The Gene Curation Coalition: A global effort to harmonize gene-disease evidence resources 93%
- COVID-19 in people with neurofibromatosis 1, neurofibromatosis 2, or schwannomatosis 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- GA4GH Phenopacket-Driven Characterization of Genotype-Phenotype Correlations in Mendelian Disorders 91%
- Consensus guidelines for eligibility assessment of pathogenic variants to antisense oligonucleotide treatments 91%
- Bi-allelic loss-of-function variants in PPFIBP1 cause a neurodevelopmental disorder with microcephaly, epilepsy and periventricular calcifications 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Using single molecule Molecular Inversion Probes as a cost-effective, high-throughput sequencing approach to target all genes and loci associated with macular diseases 93%
- REVEL is better at predicting pathogenicity of loss-of-function than gain-of-function variants 92%
- The Genomic Landscape of Pediatric Rheumatology Disorders in the Middle East 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Polycomb-associated and Trithorax-associated developmental conditions – phenotypic convergence and heterogeneity 92%
- Evaluation of the Diagnostic Accuracy of GPT-4 in Five Thousand Rare Disease Cases 91%
- BCL11A intellectual developmental disorder: defining the clinical spectrum and genotype-phenotype correlations 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.