Early health technology assessment of digital diabetes screening in Switzerland: cost-effectiveness and budget impact analyses
Mekniran, W.; Bruegger, V.; Fuchs, M.; Jin, Q.; Wirth, B.; Bilz, S.; Braendle, M.; Fleisch, E.; Kowatsch, T.; Jovanova, M.
Show abstract
ObjectivesDigital biomarkers offer scalable screening for type 2 diabetes, yet adoption is stalled by uncertainty regarding economic viability. This study evaluates the cost-effectiveness and budget impact of digital screening compared to opportunistic screening from a Swiss payer perspective. MethodsA probabilistic Markov cohort model was developed to simulate at-risk Swiss adults (age [≥]45, BMI [≥]25 kg/m{superscript 2}) over a 40-year horizon. The model incorporates a digital attrition parameter, inputs derived from Swiss-specific sources (e.g., the CoLaus study and FSO life tables), and statutory tariffs. Costs and outcomes were discounted at 3.0%. ResultsIn the deterministic base-case, digital screening yielded an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of CHF 2,912 per quality-adjusted life-year gained. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis indicated a 93.2% probability of cost-effectiveness at the CHF 50,000 threshold. The budget impact analysis estimated a Year 1 gross investment budget of CHF 27 million to identify prevalent cases, followed by long-term savings from averted complications. ConclusionsDigital screening can be highly cost-effective in Switzerland. While the required Year 1 gross investment poses a liquidity challenge, reimbursement via pathway-oriented models under the Swiss tariff could align incentives with long-term complication avoidance.
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Pricing Treatments Cost-Effectively When They Have Multiple Indications: Not Just a Simple Threshold Analysis 90%
- A Tutorial on Discrete Event Simulation Models in R Using a Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Example 89%
- A novel decision modeling framework for health policy analyses when outcomes are influenced by social and disease processes 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- New IPECAD open-source model framework for the health technology assessment of early Alzheimer’s disease treatment: development and use cases 92%
- Emerging Therapies for COVID-19: the value of information from more clinical trials 91%
- Statistical Decision Properties of Imprecise Trials Assessing COVID-19 Drugs 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- Cost-effectiveness of leveraging existing HIV primary health systems and community health workers for hypertension screening and treatment in Africa: an individual-based modelling study 91%
- Robust causal inference for long-term policy decisions: cost effectiveness of interventions for obesity using Mendelian randomization 91%
- Health impact and cost-effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccination in Sindh Province, Pakistan 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- The potential health impact and healthcare cost savings of different sodium reduction strategies in Canada 93%
- Cost-effectiveness of antigen testing for ending COVID-19 isolation 90%
- Association between vaccination rates and COVID-19 health outcomes in the United States: a population-level statistical analysis 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Remdesivir as a tool to relieve hospital care systems stressed by COVID-19: A modelling study on bed resources and budget impact 91%
- Development of a prediction model for 30-day COVID-19 hospitalization and death in a national cohort of Veterans Health Administration patients – March 2022 - April 2023 91%
- Actionable absolute risk prediction of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: a behavior-management approach based on data from 464,547 UK Biobank participants 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.