Historical Perspectives in Medicine using a Large Language Model: Emulating an 18th Century Physician
Malladi, P.; Eaton, J.; Gleichgerrcht, E.; Chatzistamou, I.; Roark, K.; Kennedy, S. W.; Bonilha, L.
Show abstract
IntroductionEighteenth-century medical texts document a formative period in the evolution of clinical reasoning, yet their integration into modern medical education is limited. The traditional approach to learning the history of medicine has naturally focused on passive reading, but new approaches using AI could enable learners to interrogate and simulate the historical diagnostic logic and therapeutic paradigms. More specifically, large language models (LLMs) offer an opportunity to create interactive simulations that allow experiential engagement with historical medical reasoning. MethodsWe developed a historically constrained LLM-based educational platform designed to emulate the diagnostic reasoning, language, and conceptual frameworks of an 18th-century physician. A modern GPT architecture was customized using strict instruction-based constraints and limited exclusively to a curated corpus of six foundational 17th- 18th century medical texts. Guardrails were implemented to prevent anachronistic terminology and modern medical concepts. Model outputs were evaluated qualitatively by comparing the models diagnoses and treatment plans with published diagnoses and treatment from original 18th century sources. We also applied the simulation to modern clinical vignettes for an illustrative contrast between modern and 18th century approaches. ResultsThe model generated responses that closely aligned with 18th-century medical and rhetorical style, as well as therapeutic reasoning. When presented with historical cases, the simulation demonstrated strong concordance with original diagnoses and management strategies. Secondly, when applied to modern cases, the model described period-appropriate reasoning, highlighting clear contrasts with contemporary biomedical reasoning. ConclusionsAI broadly, and more specifically LLMs configured as historically constrained simulators, can function as effective tools for learning in medical history. This approach could enable active engagement with historical clinical reasoning, fostering critical reflection on the contingent and evolving nature of medical knowledge. Such temporal simulations hold promise for medical humanities education and interdisciplinary teaching.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Large language models for generating medical examinations: systematic review 96%
- Medical students' perceptions towards artificial intelligence in education and practice: A multinational, multicenter cross-sectional study 95%
- Performance of ChatGPT on Chinese National Medical Licensing Examinations: A Five-Year Examination Evaluation Study for Physicians, Pharmacists and Nurses 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Performance of o1 pro and GPT-4 in self-assessment questions for nephrology board renewal 91%
- Emerging Applications of NLP and Large Language Models in Gastroenterology and Hepatology: A Systematic Review 90%
- Growth rate and acceleration analysis of the COVID-19 pandemic reveals the effect of public health measures in real time 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluation of Self-Directed Learning Activities at King Abdulaziz University: A Qualitative Study of Faculty Perceptions 92%
- Legal Frameworks Upholding Deceased Individuals’ Rights and Enabling the Use of Cadavers in Anatomy Education and Research: A Systematic Review 91%
- YouTube as an information source during the Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic: Evaluation of the Turkish and English content 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.