Back

Direct and Indirect Genetic Effects of Parental Liabilities to Mental Health Conditions and Related Traits on Children's Behavioural Difficulties: A Multi-Cohort Study

Tian, L.; Shahisavandi, M.; Askelund, A. D.; Pool, R.; Verhoef, E.; Mueller, S.; Rohm, T.; Lahti-Pulkkinen, M.; Frank, J.; Zillich, E.; Pahnke, C.; Schowe, A.; Tuhkanen, J.; Fortaner Uya, L.; Vai, B.; Benedetti, F.; Forstner, A. J.; Czamara, D.; Kandler, C.; Gilles, M.; Witt, S.; de Vries, L.; Boomsma, D. I.; Bartels, M.; Raikkonen, K.; Ask, H.; Andreassen, O.; Pingault, J.-B.; St Pourcain, B.; Cecil, C. A. M.; Havdahl, A. K. S.; Neumann, A.; Lahti, J.

2026-02-12 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.64898/2026.02.10.26345985 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundParental genetics matters for childrens behavioural difficulties, but the extent to which this is due to direct genetic transmission versus environmentally mediated indirect genetic effects remains unclear. MethodsWe studied eight European birth cohorts with over 33,000 family-based trio samples. We analysed polygenic scores (PGSs) for 13 mental health and neurodevelopmental conditions and their composite indices (PC1 and mean) representing general neuropsychiatric liabilities, as well as educational attainment (EA) and alcohol and cigarette use, from children (PGSc), mothers (PGSm), and fathers. Child internalising, externalising, and total difficulties reported by mothers and/or fathers were examined at preschool and school ages. We then conducted multivariate meta-analyses to combine cohort-level results. FindingsWe observed several direct genetic effects on externalising difficulties, while indirect genetic influences were mainly identified for internalising difficulties. Specifically, child PGSs for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and EA predicted higher and lower levels, respectively, of child externalising and total difficulties (all pFDR<0{middle dot}001; for school-aged externalising difficulties, PGSc-ADHD: {beta}=0{middle dot}121 [95% CI 0{middle dot}091 to 0{middle dot}151], pFDR<0{middle dot}0001; PGSc-EA: {beta}=-0{middle dot}095 [95% CI -0{middle dot}127 to -0{middle dot}063], pFDR<0{middle dot}0001), whereas maternal PGSs for major depressive disorder (MDD) and general neuropsychiatric liabilities were associated with internalising and total difficulties across parental raters and child ages (all pFDR<0{middle dot}05; for school-aged internalising difficulties, PGSm-MDD: {beta}=0{middle dot}049 [95% CI 0{middle dot}017 to 0{middle dot}081], pFDR=0{middle dot}016; PGSm-PC1: {beta}=0{middle dot}056 [95% CI 0{middle dot}022 to 0{middle dot}091], pFDR=0{middle dot}011). No statistically significant effects from paternal PGSs were identified. InterpretationIn this multi-cohort study, findings across multiple traits, raters, and ages supported several direct genetic effects of ADHD and EA on child externalising difficulties and indirect genetic effects on internalising difficulties, especially maternal depression and general neuropsychiatric liabilities. These suggest that child internalising difficulties are not solely driven by direct genetic transmission. More comprehensive research is needed to better understand the mechanisms involved, and ultimately how to ameliorate child behavioural difficulties. FundingEU, ERC, RCN, RCF, UKRI, SERI, DFG Research in contextO_ST_ABSEvidence before this studyC_ST_ABSIndirect genetic effects (IGEs) refer to the influence of parental genotypes on offspring outcomes beyond direct genetic effects (DGEs), for example via environmental pathways. While IGEs on offspring cognitive traits are well-established for educational attainment, evidence for IGEs of parental liabilities to mental health and neurodevelopmental conditions remains limited. To assess the current state of evidence, we conducted a systematic search of published studies applying trio-based polygenic score (PGS) designs to child and adolescent mental health outcomes. We identified 141 primary studies in MEDLINE, Embase, PsycInfo, and Web of Science, by 6 March 2025, after removing duplicates; following screening, 12 studies met inclusion criteria (see supplement for a full description including results). Ten out of the 12 studies focused on externalising outcomes, with little or inconsistent support for IGEs. When observed, IGEs were mainly driven by maternal liabilities to autism, educational attainment, and cognitive performance on child outcomes. The current evidence was too limited and heterogeneous to synthesize findings quantitatively, therefore a qualitative synthesis was conducted. Many studies were statistically underpowered, and the observed IGEs were in all cases sample-specific. There were no published multi-cohort studies. Added value of this studyWe integrated information across over 33,000 mother-father-child trios from eight European cohorts, investigating 18 PGSs from parents and children, using maternal and paternal ratings of offsprings internalising, externalising, and total difficulties as outcomes at both preschool and school age. We mainly observed DGEs on externalising difficulties, consistent with previous studies. Some evidence of IGEs was found for internalising and total difficulties. IGEs were often found to be maternally driven, with the most robust evidence across ages and raters emerging for maternal depression and general neuropsychiatric liabilities. Implications of all the available evidenceThe current evidence suggests that childrens behavioural difficulties, especially internalising difficulties, may be partly driven by the environment shaped by maternal neuropsychiatric liabilities. Ours and previous findings highlight a pressing need for more comprehensive studies across different cohorts, raters, outcomes, and time points to understand the true extent of IGEs in the intergenerational transmission of mental health.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
32.4%
2
Psychological Medicine
74 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.3%
50% of probability mass above
3
Molecular Psychiatry
242 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.8%
4
The British Journal of Psychiatry
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.8%
5
Biological Psychiatry Global Open Science
54 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.5%
6
European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
7
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.0%
8
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.3%
9
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
43 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
10
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
11
American Journal of Medical Genetics Part B: Neuropsychiatric Genetics
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.6%
12
European Psychiatry
10 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
13
Translational Psychiatry
219 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
14
JAMA Pediatrics
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.2%
15
Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging
62 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
16
Molecular Autism
29 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
17
American Journal of Psychiatry
20 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
18
BMC Psychiatry
22 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
19
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 64%
0.7%
20
Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica
10 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
21
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
22
npj Science of Learning
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.6%
23
Biological Psychiatry
119 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
24
Brain, Behavior, and Immunity
105 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%