Back

Prognostic Impact of Embryonal and Yolk Sac Components in Metastatic Germ Cell Tumors. Insights from an International Cohort.

Pedregal, M.; Mahillo-Fernandez, I.; Miras, I.; Perez Valderrama, B.; Morales Barrera, R.; Marmolejo, D.; Sobrevilla, N.; Bourlon, M.; Ravi, P.; Moreno, V.; Sweeney, C.

2026-02-12 oncology
10.64898/2026.02.10.26345982 medRxiv
Show abstract

PurposePrognosis in metastatic non-seminomatous germ cell tumors (mNSGCT) is currently guided by the IGCCCG classification, which incorporates tumor markers, organs involved with metastatic disease, and primary site but not histologic subtype. We aimed to evaluate whether specific histological components provide additional prognostic information in a large international mNSGCT cohort. Patient and MethodsWe analyzed clinical, pathologic, and outcome data from 662 patients with mNSGCT across multiple international centers. Cox regression and multivariable stepwise models were used to evaluate the impact of age, tumor histology, serum markers, primary site of disease, chemotherapy, IGCCCG, and post-chemotherapy surgery on overall survival. Analyses were performed using both complete-case and imputed datasets to account for missing values. ResultsThe presence of any percentage of embryonal carcinoma (EC) was independently associated with improved overall survival HR 0.603 (95% CI: 0.37-0.98, p=0.040), whereas yolk sac tumor (YST) predicted worse prognosis in complete-case analysis HR 2.27 (95% CI: 1.43 - 3.61 p = 0.001). Choriocarcinoma was also associated with a HR 1.58 (95% CI: 1.08 - 2.32 p= 0.019) adverse outcomes. IGCCCG risk classification remained a strong predictor of mortality HR up to 8.9 for Poor vs Good risk, (95% CI: 4.63 - 17.09 p < 0.001), but histologic components added significant independent prognostic value. Post-chemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) conferred a substantial survival benefit HR 0.44 (95% CI: 0.258 - 0.754 p=0.003). Interestingly, teratoma was not associated with mortality but was linked to younger age, testicular primaries, and higher likelihood of residual disease requiring surgery. ConclusionsHistological composition, particularly the presence of EC or YST, has a significant and independent impact on survival in mNSGCT, beyond established risk classifications. Integration of histological subtypes may enhance prognostic accuracy and guide individualized treatment strategies in advanced germ cell tumors.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
17.3%
2
British Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.3%
3
JCO Precision Oncology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.0%
4
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
9.0%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 20%
6.2%
50% of probability mass above
6
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 43%
3.0%
7
International Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.7%
8
Neuro-Oncology
30 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.6%
9
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 49%
2.1%
10
Clinical Cancer Research
58 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.1%
11
Annals of Oncology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.8%
12
European Journal of Cancer
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
13
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
14
Cancer Medicine
24 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
15
Neuro-Oncology Advances
24 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.6%
16
The Journal of Pathology
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
17
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
35 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.5%
18
Modern Pathology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
19
Journal of Medical Genetics
28 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
20
Journal of Clinical Pathology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
21
BMC Cancer
52 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
22
Acta Neuropathologica
51 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
23
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
16 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
24
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
25
British Journal of Haematology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%