Back

Development and Validation of the Intensive Documentation Index for ICU Mortality Prediction: A Temporal Validation Study

Collier, A.

2026-03-18 health informatics
10.64898/2026.02.10.26345827 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundNursing documentation patterns may reflect patient acuity and clinical deterioration, yet their prognostic value remains underexplored. We developed the Intensive Documentation Index (IDI), a novel framework quantifying temporal documentation rhythms, and evaluated its ability to enhance ICU mortality prediction.58 MethodsWe analyzed 26,153 ICU admissions of heart failure patients from the MIMIC-IV database (2008-2019). Nine IDI features capturing documentation rhythm, volume, and surveillance gaps were extracted from electronic health record timestamps during the first 24 hours of ICU stay. We compared logistic regression models with and without IDI features using temporal validation and race-stratified analysis.2124 ResultsThe cohort had a mean age of 68.5 {+/-} 13.2 years and an in-hospital mortality rate of 15.99% (n=4,181). The baseline model (age, sex, ICU length of stay) achieved an AUC of 0.658 (95% CI 0.609-0.710). Addition of nine IDI features significantly improved discrimination to 0.683 (95% CI 0.631-0.732), an absolute increase of 0.025 (p<0.05, DeLong test). Leave-one-year-out cross-validation across 12 years yielded a mean AUC of 0.684 (SD 0.008). The coefficient of variation of inter-event intervals (idi_cv_interevent) was the strongest predictor (OR 1.53 per SD, 95% CI 1.38-1.70, p<0.001). Model performance was consistent across racial and ethnic groups (AUC range 0.673-0.691), with no evidence of systematic bias. ConclusionsDocumentation rhythm patterns, captured through the IDI framework, significantly enhance ICU mortality prediction beyond traditional clinical variables. The association between documentation irregularity and mortality may reflect nursing workload, patient acuity, or care processes warranting further investigation. IDI represents a novel, readily available prognostic signal that could inform future clinical decision support systems.25

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.3%
2
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
8.3%
3
JMIR Medical Informatics
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.7%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 20%
6.3%
5
JAMIA Open
37 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.2%
6
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
61 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
6.2%
50% of probability mass above
7
Critical Care Explorations
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
8
BMJ
49 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.5%
9
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.0%
10
European Heart Journal - Digital Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.6%
11
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 46%
2.4%
12
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 8%
2.0%
13
Journal of General Internal Medicine
20 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.9%
14
Journal of Biomedical Informatics
45 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
15
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
16
Critical Care
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.6%
17
Frontiers in Digital Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.3%
18
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
19
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
39 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
20
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
21
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
14 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
22
The Lancet Digital Health
25 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
23
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 62%
0.8%
24
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
25
BMC Medical Research Methodology
43 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
26
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
27
Physiological Measurement
12 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
28
European Respiratory Journal
54 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
29
International Journal of Medical Informatics
25 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%