Germline sequencing in children with cancer in Quebec: an integrated investigative approach
Sepulchre, E.; Rouette, A.; Freycon, C.; Witkowski, L.; Jammali, S.; Sontag, T.; Langlois, S.; Sultan, N.; Budd, C.; Lisi, V.; Richer, C.; Jouan, L.; Lepage, M.-E.; Reichmann, L.; Foulkes, W.; Laberge, A.-M.; Michon, B.; Brossard, J.; Jabado, N.; Sinnett, D.; Tran, T.-H.; Vairy, S.; Santiago, R.; Cellot, S.; Goudie, C.; Lavallee, V.-P.
Show abstract
BackgroundThe province of Quebec has progressively implemented paired tumour-germline sequencing in paediatric oncology through two coordinated precision research programs, preceding a province-wide mainstream clinical genomics initiative. We report the prevalence, spectrum, and clinical relevance of germline findings (GFs) in children with primary extracranial cancers, integrating molecular, phenotypic, and pathological data. MethodsPatients enrolled between 2014 and 2022 underwent germline whole-exome sequencing (WES) using a virtual 352-cancer gene panel. Sequencing, bioinformatics and variant interpretation followed best practices standards based on GATK, ACMG/AMP and ClinGen recommendations. Somatic WES and transcriptomic data were integrated when available. GFs were categorised as diagnostic findings (DFs; established or suspicious association with the cancer phenotype) or as other findings further subcategorised according to actionability and age of disease onset. FindingsAmong 484 children, 130 (26.9%) carried 149 GFs, including 49 (10.1%) with a DF (42 with well-established associations with cancer phenotypes). DFs involved 21 genes related to childhood cancer predisposition, trisomy 21 and one clinical Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome. Six DFs were initially missed by standard exome pipelines, and mosaic constitutional cancer predisposition syndrome (CPS) was confirmed in 4/49 children, underscoring the value of integrative analyses. A CPS was known at the time of primary cancer in 10/49 children. Among those diagnosed with a CPS after cancer onset, suggestive phenotypic features were present in 36/39. Other non-diagnostic findings were identified in 92 children; 21 (4.3% of the cohort) with actionable implications in childhood (n=7) or adulthood (n=14). Somatic sequencing was informative for refining causality, as somatic second hit alterations were identified in 29/33 (87.9%) DFs involving monoallelic tumour suppressor genes, whereas no such alterations were observed in non-DFs counterparts (0/57; p<0.0001). Interpretation: This provincial research experience highlights the analytical and practical challenges of germline evaluation in paediatric oncology and supports a shift toward integrative interpretation frameworks combining complementary germline, somatic, pathology, and phenotypic data. Flexibility in investigative strategies and nuanced categorisation of findings are warranted, guided by a child-centred interpretative framework. This approach underpins Quebecs paediatric oncology genomics mainstreaming initiative.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Integrated germline and somatic molecular profiling to detect cancer predisposition has a high clinical impact in poor-prognosis paediatric cancer 93%
- Elucidating the heterogeneity of immunotherapy response and immune-related toxicities by longitudinal ctDNA and immune cell compartment tracking in lung cancer 91%
- The genomic landscape of early stage ovarian high grade serous carcinoma 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- First-born twin has a higher risk of acute leukemia in a population-based assessment of cancer in twins in California, and lower than anticipated rate of twin concordance 94%
- Quantification of measurable residual disease using duplex sequencing in adults with acute myeloid leukemia 93%
- Mutational landscape of high-grade B-cell lymphoma with MYC-, BCL2 and/or BCL6 rearrangements characterized by whole-exome sequencing 92%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.