Back

Functional Reorganization of Motor Subcircuits in Parkinson's disease

Theofanopoulou, C.; Bajaj, N.; Sanchez, A. M.; Crosson, B.; Wolf, S. L.; Krishnamurthy, V.; McGregor, K.; Hackney, M. E.

2026-02-10 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.02.09.704910 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Parkinsons disease disrupts motor control across multiple body parts, yet the neural mechanisms underlying these impairments remain incompletely defined. We compared resting-state functional connectivity in people with mild-to-moderate Parkinsons disease (n = 58) and neurotypical older adults (n = 24), focusing on regions implicated in internally generated (IG) and externally generated (EG) movement pathways. For our analysis, we leveraged the reproducible NeuroMark independent component template and motor effector-specific mapping of primary motor cortex (M1). Our results reveal both increased and decreased connectivity patterns in Parkinsons disease: M1 subregions associated with control of the leg, hand, and larynx showed robust increases in connectivity exclusively with cerebellar territories, particularly Crus II and Lobules VIIIa/VIIIb. The postcentral gyrus (primary somatosensory cortex) showed primarily increased connectivity with cerebellar regions and the insula. In contrast, the caudate nucleus displayed a mixed profile, with increased connectivity to the superior temporal gyrus and decreased connectivity to the superior medial frontal gyrus and cerebellar Crus II. Our motor effector-specific analysis of disease severity scores (MDS-UPDRS) in people with Parkinsons disease revealed mild impairments across all categories (leg, hand, larynx) but disproportionately greater hand-related deficits, suggesting that some of the observed M1 connectivity differences may be influenced by these behavioral asymmetries. These anatomically precise, effector-specific alterations suggest compensatory recruitment of cerebellar circuits in Parkinsons disease and provide a framework for targeting motor subcircuits in rehabilitation, including dance-based interventions.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.