Back

Automated Detection of Quiet and Non-Quiet Sleep in Preterm Neonates from aEEG: Towards Predicting Brain Maturation

De Backer, T.; Fabregat-Sanjuan, A.; Sole-Casals, J.; Pascual-Rubio, V.; Pamies-Vila, R.

2026-02-11 bioengineering
10.64898/2026.02.09.704893 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundPreterm birth is associated with an increased risk for neurodevelopmental impairments, requiring brain monitoring using amplitude-integrated electroencephalography (aEEG). While established tools detect severe dysfunction (e.g., Hellstrom-Westas classification), methods for assessing mild to moderate impairments--such as Burdjalov scoring or expert-based Sleep-Wake Cycle identification--are subjective and require specialized training. Automated neonatal sleep-staging models usually rely on polysomnography from term infants, a resource-intensive method rarely feasible in NICUs, where simplified single-channel aEEG is standard. MethodsaEEG recordings from 40 neurologically healthy neonates (32-42 weeks PMA) were collected and annotated for quiet (QS) and non-quiet sleep (NQS) by an expert clinician. Signals were bandpass filtered, segmented into 30 s epochs, and cleaned using impedance thresholds. 69 temporal, spectral, wavelet, EMG-inspired, and aEEG-envelope features were extracted. The 5 most relevant features were selected for QS/NQS classification using several machine-learning models validated with leave-one-subject-out cross-validation. A partial least squares model was then trained on QS-derived features to predict postmenstrual age and assess correlations with brain maturation. ResultsThe k-Nearest Neighbors (KNN) classifier showed the best QS/NQS discrimination, with mean Cohens{kappa} = 0.69 {+/-} 0.14 for preterm (32-37 weeks PMA) and 0.48 {+/-} 0.21 for term infants. QS-derived features correlated strongly with postmenstrual age (PMA). The PLS model predicted PMA with an average error of 0.88 weeks (MSE = 1.33 weeks, r = 0.91), while the fully automated version using predicted QS segments yielded an error of 1.08 weeks (r = 0.86). ConclusionAutomated QS/NQS detection from single-channel aEEG is feasible in preterm neonates. Despite reduced accuracy in term infants, QS-derived features closely track brain maturation, supporting the potential of aEEG-based models for objective, early detection of neuromaturation delays in preterm infants

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.8%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 6%
10.2%
3
Journal of Sleep Research
31 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.3%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 25%
6.9%
5
SLEEP
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.5%
50% of probability mass above
6
Journal of Neural Engineering
197 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.0%
7
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.6%
8
Sleep Medicine
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.1%
9
Brain Stimulation
112 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.1%
10
Sleep
26 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
11
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
12
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
28 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.5%
13
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
14
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
15
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
16
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.3%
17
Journal of Neuroscience Research
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
18
Physiological Measurement
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
19
Sensors
39 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
20
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
21
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.7%
22
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
23
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 40%
0.5%
24
Journal of Neurophysiology
263 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
25
JMIR mHealth and uHealth
10 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.5%
26
Frontiers in Pediatrics
29 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
27
Frontiers in Digital Health
20 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%