Back

VC-RDAgent: An efficient rare disease diagnosis agent via virtual case construction informed by hybrid statistical-metric and hyperbolic-semantic prioritization

Liu, Y.; Li, H.; Jiang, P.; Wu, L.; Xie, Z.; Ning, C.; Kong, X.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, X.; Huang, Z.

2026-02-11 bioinformatics
10.64898/2026.02.09.702153 bioRxiv
Show abstract

While Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown promise in clinical decision support, current Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) paradigms face a fundamental bottleneck in rare disease diagnosis: the scarcity, privacy restrictions, and extreme heterogeneity of real-world patient records. This reliance on sparse or inaccessible data leads to a severe "retrieval mismatch," where the lack of high-quality reference cases causes diagnostic performance to degrade sharply. To break this deadlock, we propose VC-RDAgent, a privacy-preserving and offline-capable framework that decouples diagnostic reasoning from sensitive real-world records by synthesizing virtual standardized cases. The system is powered by VC-Ranker, a multi-dimensional engine that integrates statistical-metric measures with hyperbolic-semantic embeddings to capture deep hierarchical ontology relationships. This approach allows for the dynamic generation of high-fidelity virtual references directly from authoritative knowledge bases. Extensive benchmarking across four diverse datasets demonstrates that VC-RDAgent effectively functions as a "performance equalizer." It boosts average Top-1 hit rates by 8.7% to 85.9% over zero-case baselines, enabling lightweight open-source models to rival frontier commercial systems. Notably, VC-Ranker alone achieved an aggregate Top-10 hit rate of 0.819, outperforming prior state-of-the-art methods by 6%. By eliminating the dependency on real-time web retrieval and private case sharing, VC-RDAgent provides a scalable, robust, and clinically deployable solution to shorten the diagnostic odyssey, which is made accessible through an intuitive, chat-based web application https://rarellm.service.bio-it.tech/rdagent/.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.