Back

Rhizoctonia theobromae isolates causing Vascular-Streak Dieback of Cocoa and Cassava Witches' Broom Disease are likely host-specific, regionally divergent and homothallic

Tobias, P. A.; Downs, J. M.; Nolf, S.; Purwantara, A.; Muhammad, J.; Brugman, E.; Möller, M.; Nowicki, M.; Pardo, J. M.; Guest, D. I.

2026-02-09 microbiology
10.64898/2026.02.08.704712 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The fastidious basidiomycete Rhizoctonia (Ceratobasidium) theobromae is a biotrophic pathogen that causes Vascular-Streak Dieback (VSD) of Theobroma cacao (cocoa). The fungus has also been identified as the cause of an emergent disease known as Cassava Witches Broom Disease (CWBD) raising concerns that the pathogen is spreading to alternative hosts and to new regions. Interestingly, while VSD of cocoa and CWBD are reported as co-present in several countries, there is currently no evidence for cross-infection between species. The fungus is difficult to culture in vitro due its slow growth and Kochs postulates have not been definitive on either host. The complete fungus life cycle therefore remains enigmatic, though studies have progressed knowledge on pathology within the both the cocoa and cassava hosts. We have conducted limited field trials and sequenced mating (MAT) and ITS loci of isolates from various infected hosts and regions. We hypothesize that (i) genetic variation at MAT loci correlates with region or host (ii) long amplicon ITS sequences between isolates are more definitive for polymorphisms (iii) life-cycle traits of R. theobromae may be inferred from MAT loci (iv) cassava grown under VSD infected cocoa will be infected and develop symptoms of CWBD. We did not find any cross-infection in field trials, and we show that the pathogen is highly homozygous, despite undergoing meiosis, indicating a predominantly homothallic life cycle. Our data indicate that the pathogen is likely host specific and regionally divergent and suggests that host specificity on cocoa and cassava evolved by selection from a common ancestor rather than a host jump.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Plant Disease
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.4%
2
Phytopathology®
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.4%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 32%
4.8%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 25%
4.8%
5
mSphere
281 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.5%
6
Plant Pathology
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
50% of probability mass above
7
Journal of Fungi
31 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.5%
8
Fungal Genetics and Biology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.0%
9
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.6%
10
G3
33 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.6%
11
International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.3%
12
Microorganisms
101 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.9%
13
Environmental Microbiology
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
14
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
15
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.7%
16
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.5%
17
Environmental Microbiology Reports
27 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
18
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
301 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
19
Microbiological Research
19 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
20
Access Microbiology
22 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
21
Journal of Microbiological Methods
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
22
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
98 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
23
Evolutionary Applications
91 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
24
Microbiology
57 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
25
Pathogens
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
26
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
27
G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics
222 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
28
Microbial Genomics
204 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
29
Molecular Plant Pathology
22 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%