Back

Lactate Cut-offs for 28-Day Mortality in Septic Shock

Wanka, S.-T.; Zilberszac, R.; Hermann, A.; Lenz, M.; Hengstenberg, C.; Schellongowski, P.; Staudinger, T.

2026-02-10 intensive care and critical care medicine
10.64898/2026.02.08.26345840 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundEarly lactate is widely used to risk-stratify septic shock, yet clinically actionable cut-offs for 28-day mortality remain uncertain. MethodsIn a single-centre study conducted across two intensive care units, we analysed 84 adults with septic shock identified within 24 hours of intensive care unit admission. The primary endpoint was 28-day mortality. Four lactate metrics obtained during the first 24 hours were evaluated: first (admission) lactate, last lactate, peak lactate, and lactate clearance from first to last. Associations were tested using logistic regression with and without adjustment for the Simplified Acute Physiology Score 3; discrimination was assessed by area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUROC), and optimal cut-offs were defined by the Youden index. ResultsThirty-nine of 84 patients (46.4%) died by day 28. Higher absolute lactate values were independently associated with death (adjusted odds ratio (OR) per 1 mmol/L increase: First 1.47, p<0.001; Last 1.41, p=0.002; Peak 1.39, p<0.001), whereas Lactate clearance was not (OR 0.65, p=0.202). Discrimination was moderate to good for peak (AUROC 0.817), first (0.791), and last (0.757) lactate, and poor for clearance (0.577). Youden-derived thresholds provided pragmatic trade-offs: First 3.55 mmol/L (sensitivity 0.821, specificity 0.689), Last 3.15 mmol/L (0.567, 0.864), and Peak 3.55 mmol/L (0.973, 0.556). Kaplan-Meier curves using these cut-offs showed early and sustained separation. ConclusionsIn adults with septic shock, simple early lactate thresholds around 3.3- 3.6 mmol/L (first/peak) and approximately 3.15 mmol/L (last) identify 28-day mortality risk and outperform lactate clearance.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Critical Care Explorations
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
33.8%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 21%
8.6%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 22%
5.0%
4
Critical Care
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.1%
50% of probability mass above
5
British Journal of Anaesthesia
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.8%
6
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.7%
7
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
8
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.9%
9
Journal of Neurology
26 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
10
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
11
Pediatric Research
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
12
Wellcome Open Research
57 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
13
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
14
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
15
Neurocritical Care
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
16
Clinical Chemistry
22 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.4%
17
The Lancet
16 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.4%
18
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.0%
19
Journal of Internal Medicine
12 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
20
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
21
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
22
EClinicalMedicine
21 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
23
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
24
Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases
12 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
25
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
39 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
26
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.8%
27
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
28
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
29
Frontiers in Pediatrics
29 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
30
Journal of Hospital Infection
27 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%