Back

Unveiling protist composition and diversity patterns with eDNA metabarcoding: comparing short- and long-read approaches

SKOUROLIAKOU, D. I.; Dupont Valcy, D. W. E.; Yelle, V.; D'hont, S.; Sabbe, K.; Schon, I.

2026-02-09 ecology
10.64898/2026.02.07.704525 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding is a key tool in biodiversity monitoring due to its high-throughput, non-destructive nature. While short-read (SR) sequencing platforms such as Illumina Miseq have been routinely used in environmental monitoring, their limited read lengths (less than 600 bp) constrain the depth of taxonomic assignment, particularly for complex microbial eukaryotes like protists. Conversely, long-read (LR) sequencing technologies like Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) offer promising alternatives but remain underutilized for studying protist communities. We conducted a comparative study of SR versus LR metabarcoding of protist communities along a coastal-offshore gradient in the Belgian part of the North Sea. Using amplicons targeting the V4 region (SR; 577 bp) and the V4-V5 region (LR; 745 bp) of the 18S rRNA gene, we compared diversity patterns, taxonomic assignment, and community composition between approaches. We observed general congruence in community composition at higher taxonomic levels, but under the applied workflows, LR metabarcoding yielded a greater depth of taxonomic annotation at lower taxonomic ranks. Notably, dinoflagellates were less overrepresented in LR data, and a unique detection of potential nuisance taxa (e.g., Bellerochea), and ecologically important genera such as haptophytes (e.g., Gephyrocapsa) was achieved. These results highlight the potential of LR metabarcoding to complement SR approaches by providing increased taxonomic annotation depth and ecological insights. Although both methods targeted only partial regions of the 18S rRNA gene, LR metabarcoding yielded a greater depth of taxonomic assignment under the applied workflows. As next-generation sequencing technologies continue to evolve, our research provides valuable insights for selecting optimal strategies in routine plankton monitoring and biodiversity assessment programs.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Water Research
74 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
14.1%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 11%
8.3%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 29%
6.2%
4
Molecular Ecology Resources
161 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.2%
5
Limnology and Oceanography: Methods
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
6
Environmental DNA
49 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
7
Frontiers in Marine Science
55 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.2%
8
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.9%
50% of probability mass above
9
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.5%
10
Metabarcoding and Metagenomics
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.8%
11
ISME Communications
103 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.7%
12
Environmental Microbiology
119 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.3%
13
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.0%
14
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.0%
15
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.0%
16
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
17
Ecological Indicators
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
18
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.5%
19
Environmental Science & Technology
64 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
20
Journal of Phycology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.3%
21
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
301 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
22
Environmental Pollution
35 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
23
Communications Earth & Environment
14 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
24
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
25
Environmental Microbiome
26 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
26
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.9%
27
FEMS Microbiology Ecology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
28
Freshwater Biology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
29
BMC Research Notes
29 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
30
The ISME Journal
194 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%