Back

Genetic evidence for repurposing immunomodulatory drugs for major depressive disorder

Jesuthasan, J.; ter Kuile, A. R.; Roiser, J.; Carvalho, L. A.; Pitman, A.; Chopade, S.; Finan, C.; Schmidt, A. F.; Pingault, J.-B.

2026-02-09 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.64898/2026.02.07.26345798 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectiveTo identify immunomodulatory drug targets with genetic evidence in major depressive disorder (MDD), probe symptom-level heterogeneity in their effects, and identify drug repurposing opportunities. MethodsWe used cis-Mendelian randomisation to evaluate the targets of 204 immunomodulatory compounds, including immunosuppressants, cytokine inhibitors, and anti-infectives. As exposures, we selected genetic instruments from nine genome-wide association studies (GWASs) of protein or gene transcript levels in blood and six brain regions, capturing peripheral and central inflammatory processes. As outcomes, we used summary statistics from GWASs of MDD and eight individual depressive symptoms. We prioritised targets based on consistency across tissues and robustness of Mendelian randomisation estimates, and prioritised compounds based on predicted therapeutic effects. ResultsWe prioritised 13 drug targets (C1S, CRBN, CUL4A, DEPE1, FCGRT, FKBP1A, HRH1, IL1RL2, IMPDH1, MMP7, POLE2, PRIM1, and S1PR4) associated with MDD risk. These are targeted by 46 compounds - mostly inhibitory - including doxycycline, sutimlimab, and pomalidomide, which may have therapeutic benefits for MDD. In symptom-level analyses, most targets showed heterogeneity across symptoms. Among prioritised targets, three showed consistent effects across more than half the symptoms, while the remainder showed symptom-specific or opposing effects between symptoms. ConclusionWe provide genetic evidence supporting the repurposing of immunomodulatory drugs for MDD, including compounds acting on novel therapeutic targets. Effects differ across depressive symptoms, suggesting that symptoms respond to different drug mechanisms. These findings highlight the importance of considering individual symptoms, rather than MDD as a unitary condition, when developing treatments with a broad spectrum of action or targeting specific symptom profiles.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Affective Disorders
81 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
12.0%
2
Molecular Psychiatry
242 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
9.8%
3
Psychological Medicine
74 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.8%
4
Translational Psychiatry
219 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
7.0%
5
Biological Psychiatry
119 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.7%
6
Brain, Behavior, and Immunity
105 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.7%
7
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.7%
50% of probability mass above
8
Biological Psychiatry Global Open Science
54 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.5%
9
European Neuropsychopharmacology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
10
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.5%
11
European Psychiatry
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
12
Acta Neuropsychiatrica
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.5%
13
American Journal of Medical Genetics Part B: Neuropsychiatric Genetics
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.3%
14
JAMA Psychiatry
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.0%
15
Journal of Psychiatric Research
28 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.6%
16
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
29 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.6%
17
BMJ Mental Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.6%
18
BJPsych Open
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.6%
19
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 54%
1.4%
20
Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging
62 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
21
Psychiatry Research
35 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
22
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
23
Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
24
American Journal of Psychiatry
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
25
Neuropsychopharmacology
134 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
26
The British Journal of Psychiatry
21 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
27
International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
28
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 69%
0.7%
29
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
30
Schizophrenia Bulletin
29 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%