Back

Environment-Wide Association Study of Chemical Biomarkers and Health Outcomes in NHANES 2017-2018: Discovery, Validation, and Dose-Response Analysis

Farquhar, H. L.

2026-02-09 occupational and environmental health
10.64898/2026.02.07.26345792 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundEnvironment-wide association studies (ExWAS) offer a systematic approach to identifying chemical biomarker-health outcome associations, yet few have applied rigorous multi-stage validation. MethodsWe screened 92 chemical biomarkers against 48 health outcomes in NHANES 2017-2018 (2,796 tests across four screening rounds; not all chemicals were crossed with all outcomes). Associations passing an initial FDR screen were subjected to cross-cycle validation in NHANES 2015-2016--the primary inferential safeguard given the adaptive screening design--followed by dose-response analysis and multiple sensitivity specifications. Survey-weighted regression models adjusted for age, sex, race/ethnicity, poverty-income ratio, BMI, and smoking. ResultsOf 26 associations passing FDR correction, 21 were testable in cross-cycle validation; of these, 15 (71%) replicated with concordant direction and p < 0.05 in a temporally independent NHANES 2015-2016 sample. Of these 15, 14 remained robust after analyte-specific sensitivity checks; urinary creatinine adjustment identified one association (iodine-BMI) as a dilution artifact. Two novel findings emerged: dimethylarsonic acid with uric acid ({beta} = 0.20 mg/dL per log-unit DMA, 95% CI: 0.15-0.26) and urinary perchlorate with BUN ({beta} = 1.21 mg/dL per log-unit perchlorate, 95% CI: 0.97-1.45); a third high-novelty association (methylmercury-waist circumference) is likely explained by fish consumption patterns. ConclusionsMulti-stage ExWAS with cross-cycle validation identified 14 robust chemical-health associations. Two novel findings--DMA-uric acid and perchlorate-BUN--survived all sensitivity checks and warrant prospective investigation.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Environmental Health Perspectives
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
40.8%
2
Environment International
42 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.9%
50% of probability mass above
3
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.5%
4
Environmental Research
46 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.5%
5
Environmental Science & Technology
64 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.7%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 33%
3.7%
7
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 37%
3.7%
8
Nature
575 papers in training set
Top 8%
3.0%
9
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.2%
10
ACS ES&T Water
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
11
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
12
Chemosphere
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
13
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
14
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
15
Journal of the Endocrine Society
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
16
PLOS Water
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
17
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
18
Epigenetics
43 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
19
NeuroToxicology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
20
BMC Genomic Data
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.8%
21
The Innovation
12 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
22
Environmental Science & Technology Letters
22 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
23
ACS Nano
99 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
24
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%