Back

Single center Automated, Multi-Source deeply Phenotyped Heart Transplant Registry as a template to build tailored data infrastructure

Patel, K.; Eager, T. N.; Ghobrial, M.; Moore, L. W.; Guha, A.; Martin, C.; Akay, M. H.; Loza, L.; Jones, S. L.; Gaber, A. O.; Bhimaraj, A.

2026-02-09 cardiovascular medicine
10.64898/2026.02.07.26345785 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundTraditional heart transplant registries often lack the granularity required for deep phenotyping and rely on labor-intensive manual abstraction. We describe the methodology and validation of a next-generation, automated, multi-source registry designed to address these limitations. MethodsUtilizing a High-Performance Computing environment, we integrated structured data from Epic data warehouses (Clarity and Caboodle), external molecular diagnostics, and verified UNOS survival records. A custom deterministic rule-based Natural Language Processing (NLP) engine was developed to extract echocardiographic measures, rejection grades, and vasculopathy scores from over 21,000 unstructured clinical reports. ResultsThe Houston Methodist J.C. Walter Jr. Transplant Center Precision Registry and Platform-Heart (TCPR-Heart) captures 1,687 heart transplants (1,636 patients) spanning the years 1984-2025. The TCPR-Heart comprises 1,054 transplants with active clinical follow-up: 555 transplants were extracted and abstracted from our modern electronic health record (EHR) in the decade since deployment, providing access to data throughout the patients course of heart transplant; 427 were legacy active transplants (transplanted pre-2016 with continued follow-up), and 72 were external transplants (transplanted elsewhere but followed at Methodist). Additionally, the registry houses a historic cohort of 633 transplants (last follow-up < June 2016) with limited variables. Automated deep phenotyping successfully generated longitudinal data trends across clinical domains, including immunosuppression strategies, rejection, immunologic HLA data, renal function, metabolic profiles, vasculopathy, graft function, hospitalization burden and survival information. ConclusionThis automated framework unifies clinical, administrative, and molecular data streams. By leveraging an automated, regularly updated registry, we established a scalable, high-fidelity data source as a foundation for further innovations and novel applications based on an expertly curated and validated data source.

Published in The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation (predicted rank #1) · training set

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation · published here
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
27.0%
2
European Heart Journal - Digital Health
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.8%
3
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 29%
4.9%
4
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 32%
4.4%
5
npj Digital Medicine
118 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.1%
6
Communications Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.3%
50% of probability mass above
7
Patterns
78 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.7%
8
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
71 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.4%
9
American Journal of Transplantation
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.2%
10
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 46%
2.2%
11
The American Journal of Cardiology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.8%
12
Circulation: Heart Failure
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
13
Circulation
74 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
14
Kidney360
22 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.8%
15
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.8%
16
Annals of the American Thoracic Society
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
17
Journal of the American Heart Association
140 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
18
Heart
11 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.5%
19
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
20
Transplantation
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.1%
21
Journal of Translational Medicine
57 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
22
BioData Mining
22 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.0%
23
Nature Medicine
125 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
24
Diabetologia
44 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
25
Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
56 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
26
Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
27
Frontiers in Public Health
148 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
28
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
43 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
29
Kidney International
29 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
30
Clinical and Translational Science
22 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%