Back
#1
13.7%
Top 1%
13.7%
#1
8.5%
Top 17%
8.5%
Top 79%
5.6%
Top 3%
5.6%
Top 3%
5.6%
Top 0.2%
5.6%
Top 3%
4.7%
Top 3%
4.7%
Top 5%
4.7%
Top 3%
1.8%
Top 11%
1.8%
Top 4%
1.8%
Top 91%
1.1%
Top 5%
0.9%
Top 37%
0.7%
Top 8%
0.7%
Top 33%
0.7%
Top 11%
0.7%
Top 5%
0.7%
Collaborative large language models (LLMs) are all you need for screening in systematic reviews
2026-02-17
health informatics
Title + abstract only
View on medRxiv
Show abstract
BackgroundThe ability of large language models (LLMs) to work collaboratively and screen studies in a systematic review (SR) is under-explored. Hence, we aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of LLMs in automating the process of screening in systematic reviews. MethodsThis is an observational study which included labeled data (title and abstracts) for five SRs. Originally, two reviewers screened the citations independently for eligibility. A third reviewer cross-checked each citation for quality ...
Predicted journal destinations
1
Research Synthesis Methods
17 training papers
2
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
53 training papers
3
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
29 training papers
4
BMJ Open
553 training papers
5
PLOS ONE
1737 training papers
6
Journal of Medical Internet Research
81 training papers
7
JAMIA Open
35 training papers
8
BMC Medical Research Methodology
41 training papers
9
Journal of Biomedical Informatics
37 training papers
10
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
36 training papers
11
PLOS Digital Health
88 training papers
12
JMIR Medical Informatics
16 training papers
13
npj Digital Medicine
85 training papers
14
International Journal of Medical Informatics
25 training papers
15
Scientific Reports
701 training papers
16
JMIR Formative Research
31 training papers
17
BMC Medicine
155 training papers
18
BMJ
49 training papers
19
JAMA Network Open
125 training papers
20
Computers in Biology and Medicine
39 training papers
21
Frontiers in Digital Health
18 training papers