Global Disparities in Access to Dermatological Care: the Skin Health Observatory
Freeman, E. E.; Yardman-Frank, J. M.; Kilmer, J.; Pacheco, A.; Su, K.; McMahon, D. E.; Li, C.; Anwar, S.; Barger, K.; Qian, Y.; Strahan, A.; Westby, S.; Bhat, R.; El Sayed, M.; Enbiale, W.; Galvan-Casas, C.; Gao, X.; Gondokaryono, S. P.; Kibbi, A. G.; Lee, A.; Ly, F.; Ocampo-Candiani, J.; Richard, M.-A.; Romiti, R.; Lim, H. W.; Takeshita, J.; Kerob, D.; Chuberre, B.; de Lambert, G.; Fuller, L. C.; Griffiths, C. E. M.; Dlova, N. C.
Show abstract
BackgroundSkin disease affects 4.7-4.9 billion individuals globally; however, little is known about access to dermatological care. MethodsWe conducted a multinational, cross-sectional survey of dermatological care across 194 WHO member states and three additional geographic areas in 2024-2025. Primary outcomes included dermatologist density per 100,000 population and number of dermatologists globally. Secondary outcomes included training programme density, workforce distribution, perceived access to care, and health system characteristics. Descriptive statistics and nonparametric tests compared outcomes across World Bank Income (WBI) levels and WHO regions. FindingsResponses were obtained from 158 countries. Mean dermatologist density was 2.66 per 100,000, ranging from 0.37 in low-income (LICs) to 5.05 in high-income countries (HICs). There are estimated 175,633 dermatologists globally (95% CI: 173,598-177,668). Forty-two percent of countries reported inadequate or extremely poor access to dermatological care. There was significant variation (p < 0.001) in access to all types of subspecialty care (paediatric, surgical, dermatopathology) across WBI levels, with consistently worse access in lower-income countries. Dermatologists are primarily based in urban centres (79%). Twenty-one percent of countries lack dermatology training programs, with training varying by WBI level (p < 0.001). Non-dermatologist healthcare workers bear a substantial responsibility for management of skin disease. InterpretationSignificant global disparities exist in access to dermatological care, particularly in lower resource settings. Achieving skin health equity will require global commitment to expanding/funding training programmes, incentivizing decentralization of dermatology practice, and optimizing alternative care delivery including upskilling front-line healthcare workers. FundingInternational League of Dermatological Societies and LOreal Dermatological Beauty.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Diagnostic value of cutaneous manifestation of SARS-CoV-2 infection 91%
- Risk mitigating behaviours in people with inflammatory joint and skin disease during the COVID-19 pandemic differ by treatment type: a cross-sectional patient survey 90%
- Sunbed users aged 18-24 views on sunbed regulationpolicies in the UK. 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Predicting skin cancer risk from facial images with an explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) based approach: a proof-of-concept study 88%
- The epidemiology of herpes simplex virus type 2 in sub-Saharan Africa: systematic review, meta-analyses, and meta-regressions 88%
- Characterizing Long COVID in an International Cohort: 7 Months of Symptoms and Their Impact 87%
Similar papers in this journal
- Development of a Core Outcome Measure Instrument; “LeishCOM_LCL”, for Localised Cutaneous Leishmaniasis 93%
- Ulcerative skin lesions among children in Cameroon: It is not always Yaws. 90%
- Prevalence of skin Neglected Tropical Diseases and superficial fungal infections in two peri-urban schools and one rural community setting in Togo 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Use of Skin Cancer Procedures, Medicare Reimbursement, and Overall Expenditures, 2012-2017 89%
- Characterizing Potential Conflicts of Interest Among UpToDate and DynaMed Content Contributors 87%
- Self-Reported Mask Wearing Greatly Exceeds Directly Observed Use: Urgent Need for Policy Intervention in Kenya 86%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.