Back

An emerging trend in STI Management: Antibiotic STI Post-Exposure Prophylaxis Prevalence and Determinants in Recent Surveys

Berners-Lee, W.; Bell, J.; Pulford, C.; Ogaz, D.; Mohammed, H.; Harris, R.; Saunders, J.

2026-02-09 epidemiology
10.64898/2026.02.06.26345737 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectivesThis study aimed to estimate the prevalence of antibiotic post-exposure prophylaxis (STI PEP) use among gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men (GBMSM) in England, and to identify demographic and behavioural factors associated with STI PEP use among early adopters. MethodsWe synthesised individual-level data from nine surveys conducted between 2019 and 2024. To harmonise variables that differed subtly across surveys, we generated composite indicators for STI diagnosis, chemsex, and condomless sex. Multiple imputation was used to address partial missingness; participants missing core sociodemographic data were excluded. The primary outcome was self-reported STI PEP use. We calculated the prevalence of use in each survey and assessed associations using mixed-effects logistic regression. Composite variables were included as random effects if they were found to have an interaction with survey. ResultsAcross nine surveys with 14,142 participants, STI PEP use prevalence ranged from 3.61% (95% confidence interval (CI): 2.78-4.68%) in RiiSH 2020 to 13.05% (11.85-14.36%) in RiiSH 2024. Use was higher among those aged 40-44 (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 1.26; 95% CI: 1.00-1.58) and lower in those under 25 (aOR = 0.56; 0.39-0.82) or over 65 (aOR = 0.64; 0.41-0.99), compared to ages 30-34. Transgender women (aOR = 3.87; 1.75-8.50), Black (aOR = 1.85; 1.34-2.56) and Asian (aOR = 1.43; 1.09-1.88) individuals, and people living with HIV (aOR = 3.40; 2.69-4.31) had higher odds of use, compared with cisgender male, White, and HIV negative individuals, respectively. Chemsex (aOR = 2.15; 1.80-2.56), condomless sex (aOR = 1.59; 1.32-1.92), and recent STI diagnosis (aOR = 1.83; 1.34-2.51) were also associated with use. ConclusionSTI PEP use was more common among those practising behaviours associated with higher STI risk. However, participation and sampling biases limit finding generalisability, particularly to underrepresented groups such as women, ethinic minorities and heterosexuals. This analysis will provide a baseline from which to estimate the impact of the recommendation of doxycycline for STI post-exposure prophylaxis in the UK.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Sexually Transmitted Infections
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
28.6%
2
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
8.7%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 24%
7.0%
4
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
6.5%
50% of probability mass above
5
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
5.0%
6
BMJ Global Health
98 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.4%
7
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 8%
2.1%
8
Journal of the International AIDS Society
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
9
JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes
19 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
10
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
11
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
12
Drug and Alcohol Dependence
37 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
13
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
14
Eurosurveillance
80 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.4%
15
Addiction
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.4%
16
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.4%
17
Emerging Infectious Diseases
103 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
18
AIDS and Behavior
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
19
International Journal of Drug Policy
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
20
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
21
Wellcome Open Research
57 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
22
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
23
The Lancet Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
24
Epidemiology
26 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
25
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 63%
0.7%
26
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 78%
0.7%
27
Preventive Medicine
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
28
AIDS
31 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
29
Clinical Microbiology and Infection
60 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
30
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
32 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.5%