Biologically contained Ebola virus enables standardised neutralisation testing for preclinical and clinical immunogenicity assessment

BackgroundNeutralising antibody titres are widely used as key immunogenicity endpoints in Ebola virus (EBOV) vaccine and monoclonal antibody clinical trials. However, direct comparison of results across studies remains challenging due to the use of heterogeneous neutralisation platforms, ranging from pseudotyped viruses to live EBOV assays. These limitations restrict assay standardisation, validation, scalability, and compliance with good clinical laboratory practice (GCLP), particularly in outbreak-prone and resource-limited settings. There is an unmet need for neutralisation assays that combine biological authenticity with clinical-trial compatibility. MethodsWe developed and optimised a fluorescence-based microneutralisation assay using a biologically contained EBOV lacking the essential VP30 gene (EBOV{Delta}VP30), enabling multi-cycle viral replication under containment level 2 conditions. Using a defined panel of serum samples from Ebola virus disease survivors and EBOV-negative controls, we benchmarked EBOV{Delta}VP30 neutralisation titres against previously generated data obtained with wild-type EBOV and pseudotyped virus platforms. Assay performance was evaluated in terms of sensitivity, reproducibility, discrimination between positive and negative samples, and correlation with live virus neutralisation. Calibration was performed using the WHO International Standard for anti-EBOV immunoglobulin. FindingsThe EBOV{Delta}VP30 microneutralisation assay robustly distinguished EBOV survivor sera from negative controls (p < 0{middle dot}0001) and demonstrated a strong correlation with live EBOV neutralisation titres (Spearman {rho} = 0{middle dot}8725). This correlation exceeded that observed for HIV-1-based pseudotyped assays and for the vesicular stomatitis virus-based platforms. The fluorescence-based read-out showed comparable sensitivity to conventional immunostaining, supporting its suitability for high-throughput and standardised implementation. Importantly, assay conditions were compatible with BSL-2 laboratories and GCLP-aligned workflows. InterpretationBiologically contained EBOV{Delta}VP30 provides a clinically relevant and scalable alternative to existing neutralisation platforms, bridging the gap between pseudotyped assays and wild-type virus testing. By improving biological relevance while maintaining accessibility and standardisation, this assay has the potential to enhance comparability of immunogenicity data across EBOV vaccine and therapeutic antibody (pre-)clinical trials, aligning with global outbreak preparedness and trial harmonisation objectives. FundingStated in acknowledgement section of manuscript. Research in contextO_ST_ABSEvidence before the studyC_ST_ABSBefore starting this study, we reviewed published work on how neutralising antibodies against Ebola virus are measured in vaccine and monoclonal antibody research. We searched PubMed, Web of Science, and reference lists of key review papers for studies published up to mid-2025, without restricting by language. Search terms included "Ebola virus", "neutralising antibodies", "neutralisation assay", "pseudovirus", "live virus", and "clinical trials". We focused on studies describing neutralisation tests using wild-type Ebola virus as well as commonly used pseudotyped virus systems. From this body of evidence, neutralisation assays using wild-type Ebola virus are considered the most biologically relevant but can only be performed in biosafety level 4 laboratories. This limits their availability, scalability, and use in clinical trials. Pseudotyped virus assays can be performed under lower biosafety conditions and are widely used, but multiple studies have reported variable performance and inconsistent agreement with live virus results. Although biologically contained Ebola viruses have been developed and used in laboratory research, their application as neutralisation assays and their direct comparison with both live virus and pseudotyped systems using the same human serum samples had not been systematically studied. As a result, it remained unclear whether such systems could support reliable immunogenicity assessment in clinical trials. Added value of this studyThis study shows that a biologically contained Ebola virus lacking the VP30 gene can be used to measure neutralising antibodies in a robust and scalable way under biosafety level 2 conditions. By directly comparing this system with wild-type Ebola virus and widely used pseudotyped assays using the same set of human serum samples, we demonstrate that neutralisation results obtained with the biologically contained virus closely align with those of the wild-type virus reference assay. The assay reliably distinguishes samples from Ebola survivors and uninfected individuals and can be read using different detection methods, making it compatible with GCLP-aligned workflows and suitable for further qualification and validation in support of clinical development. This work provides clear evidence that biologically contained Ebola virus can combine biological relevance with practical usability. Implications of all the available evidenceTogether with existing evidence, our findings indicate that biologically contained Ebola virus offers a valuable new option for measuring neutralising antibodies in vaccine and monoclonal antibody clinical trials. By reducing reliance on high-containment laboratories while preserving key features of authentic virus infection, this approach can improve the consistency and comparability of immunogenicity data across studies and sites. Broader use of such assays could support better decision-making during clinical development and strengthen outbreak preparedness. More generally, this work highlights how biologically contained viruses can help advance research licensure of medical countermeasures for high-consequence pathogens in ways that are directly relevant to human health.