An AI Agent for Automated Causal Inference in Epidemiology
Liu, H.; Shi, K.; li, A.; Li, X.; Chu, J.; Xue, Y.; Cen, S.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, T.
Show abstract
ObjectiveTo address the inefficiency, subjectivity, and high expertise barrier of traditional epidemiological causal inference, this study designed, developed, and validated an AI-powered agent (EpiCausalX Agent) to automate the end-to-end workflow. It integrates cross-database literature retrieval, intelligent causal reasoning, and Directed Acyclic Graph (DAG) visualization to provide a reliable, accessible tool for researchers. Materials and MethodsBuilt on the LangChain 1.0 framework with a layered design (Agent/Tool/Storage/Utility Layers), the agent uses the DeepSeek V3.2 LLM and ReAct paradigm for dynamic task orchestration. Four specialized tools were integrated including multi-database retrieval with 7 databases, causal inference based on Hills criteria and DAG logic, automated DAG drawing using NetworkX and Matplotlib, and clinical standard query. Performance was validated via unit tests, workflow verification, and usability testing. ResultsThe agent achieved full-process automation. It efficiently retrieves and synthesizes literature, automatically identifies confounders and mediators, and generates standardized interactive DAGs. It produces evidence-based, traceable conclusions aligned with established epidemiological knowledge. Its user-friendly natural language interface enables seamless use by non-technical researchers who complete task initiation quickly without operational confusion. The agent is publicly available on WeChat Mini Program for easy access. ConclusionEpiCausalX Agent advances intelligent, automated epidemiological research. By integrating domain expertise with AI agent technology, it overcomes limitations of manual methods and general LLMs to provide a specialized, verifiable, efficient solution. It has broad applications in observational research, clinical study design, and education to enhance productivity and lower barriers to rigorous causal analysis.
Matching journals
The top 13 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluation of SURUS: a Named Entity Recognition System to Extract Knowledge from Interventional Study Records 92%
- Scalable information extraction from free text electronic health records using large language models 92%
- Advancing data science in drug development through an innovative computational framework for data sharing and statistical analysis 92%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- An interactive retrieval system for clinical trial studies with context-dependent protocol elements 94%
- Analysis of clinical trial registry entry histories using the novel R package cthist 93%
- ChatGPT-Enhanced ROC Analysis (CERA): A Shiny Web Tool for Finding Optimal Cutoff in Biomarker Analysis 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Causal feature selection using a knowledge graph combining structured knowledge from the biomedical literature and ontologies: a use case studying depression as a risk factor for Alzheimer's disease 94%
- Creating an Ignorance-Base: Exploring Known Unknowns in the Scientific Literature 94%
- Computational Strategies in Nutrigenetics: Constructing a Reference Dataset of Nutrition-Associated Genetic Polymorphisms 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.