Diagnostic Accuracy of Artificial Intelligence for Arrhythmia Detection Using the 12-Lead Electrocardiogram: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Alencar, L. F. T. d.; Ximenes, G. F.; Bezerra, M. d. A. N.; Souza, L. B. d.; Perazolo, N. A.; Monteiro, J. P. T. B.; Viana, P. J. P.; Feitosa, M. P. M.; Vieira, J. L.; Khurshid, S.
Show abstract
BackgroundArtificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a promising tool for interpreting 12-lead electrocardiograms (ECGs), with the potential to enhance diagnostic accuracy for arrhythmia detection. However, published studies vary widely in methodology and validation strategy, warranting a quantitative synthesis of diagnostic performance. MethodsA systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted according to the PRISMA-DTA 2018 guidelines and registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251027264). Searches were performed in MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library through September 2025 without language restrictions. Studies evaluating AI algorithms for arrhythmia detection using 12-lead ECGs were included. Data on sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) were extracted. Pooled estimates were generated using a bivariate random-effects model. Risk of bias was assessed with QUADAS-2, and the certainty of evidence was quantified using GRADE. Results20 studies were included in the meta-analysis, encompassing over 5.5 million ECGs. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, and AUC for AI-based arrhythmia detection were 94.0% (95% CI 90.8-96.2; I{superscript 2} = 96.9%), 98.7% (95% CI 97.3-99.3; I{superscript 2} = 98.3%), and 0.982 (95% CI 0.965-0.986), respectively. Detection of atrial fibrillation (AF) yielded a sensitivity of 92.6% (95% CI 86.4-96), a specificity of 99.1% (95% CI 98.4-99.5), and an AUC of 0.988. Convolutional neural networks (CNN) specifically demonstrated a sensitivity of 97.6%, specificity of 98.7%, and an AUC of 0.982 for overall arrhythmia detection. When limited to external validation (n=6), the sensitivity was 96.9% (95% CI 89.2-99.1), specificity was 95.6% (95% CI 77.6-99.3), and AUC was 0.983. No significant publication bias was detected, and the overall certainty of evidence was rated as high. ConclusionsAI models applied to 12-lead ECGs demonstrate excellent diagnostic performance for arrhythmia detection. Findings support potential integration into clinical workflows, particularly in settings with limited cardiology expertise. Given substantial heterogeneity, standardized datasets and multicenter prospective validation are essential to ensure effective and equitable implementation. What is KnownO_LIArtificial intelligence has been increasingly applied to 12-lead electrocardiograms for arrhythmia detection, with multiple studies reporting high diagnostic accuracy. C_LI What the Study AddsO_LIThis meta-analysis demonstrates consistently high diagnostic performance of artificial intelligence for arrhythmia detection on 12-lead ECGs, including atrial fibrillation and externally validated models. C_LIO_LIThe substantial heterogeneity observed underscores the need for standardized datasets and multicenter prospective validation before widespread clinical implementation. C_LI
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Simple Models Versus Deep Learning in Detecting Low Ejection Fraction From The Electrocardiogram 95%
- International Evaluation Of An Artificial Intelligence-Powered Ecg Model Detecting Occlusion Myocardial Infarction 94%
- Development and Multinational Validation of an Ensemble Deep Learning Algorithm for Detecting and Predicting Structural Heart Disease Using Noisy Single-lead Electrocardiograms 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Screening for Atrial Fibrillation in Older Adults at Primary Care Visits: the VITAL-AF Randomized Controlled Trial 95%
- Arrhythmia and Survival Outcomes among Black and White Patients with a Primary Prevention Defibrillator 94%
- Electrocardiographic Manifestations of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Myocarditis 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Competing Risks in Patients with Primary Prevention Implantable Cardioverters Defibrillators: Global Electrical Heterogeneity and Clinical Outcomes (GEHCO) Study 95%
- Procedural Volume and Outcomes with Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: A Report from the NCDR AFib Ablation Registry 94%
- Right bundle branch pacing: criteria, characteristics and outcomes 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Enhancing Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation Outcomes: The Impact Of Functional Mapping In Chagas Cardiomyopathy 94%
- Multicenter analysis of atrioesophageal fistula rates before and after adoption of active esophageal cooling during atrial fibrillation ablation 92%
- Peri-Procedural Intravascular Hemolysis during Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: A Comparison of Pulsed-Field with Radiofrequency Ablation 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.