Back

A Functional Basis for the Developmental Sequence of the Macrostructure of the Venus Flower Basket (Euplectella aspergillum)

Mistry, Y.; Morankar, S.; Kingsbury, D.; Chawla, N.; Penick, C.; Bhate, D.

2026-02-08 developmental biology
10.64898/2026.02.05.704042 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Despite receiving significant interest from the biological and engineering communities, several questions about the underlying reasons for the form of the deep-sea sponge Venus Flower Basket (Euplectela aspergillum) remain unanswered. In particular, the basis for the sequence of emergence of three distinct macroscopic geometric features, while speculated upon, has not been validated. These features are (i) an interwoven cross-grid in the juvenile stage, (ii) a diagonal weave atop this initial grid, and (iii) a helical ridge that emerges in the mature phase of the sponge. This work uses computational design and additive manufacturing to fabricate models of each of these phases in sequence and subjects the models to mechanical tests in compression, bending and torsion. The results show that each feature has a singular advantage, even after accounting for the increase in mass associated with their addition: increased compliance for interwoven cross-grid, increased bending stiffness for diagonal weaves, and improved torsional rigidity for the helical ridge. The work postulates that the prioritization of compliance in the juvenile phase and a transition to a stiffer structure in the mature phase is a strategy that enables the sponge to avoid high internal stresses to avoid failure in its inherently brittle, silica-derived architecture. Highlights1. The benefits of three macrostructural design elements of the Venus Flower Basket (E. aspergillum) that emerge sequentially in its development are examined: (i) the interweaving cross-grid, (ii) the diagonal weave that overlays this cross-grid, and (iii) the helical ridge reinforcement that forms over this diagonal weave. 2. For the first time, this work models each of these design features sequentially and studies their mechanical benefits through an experimental exploration of the behavior of idealized geometries in three test domains: compression, bending, and torsion. 3. Results show that each of these three structural elements has a unique functional advantage depending on the organisms growth stage, even after accounting for differences in mass: interweaving enables higher compliance under compression, the diagonal weave improves bending stiffness, and the helical ridge improves torsional stiffness.

Matching journals

The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 18%
10.4%
2
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 28%
6.5%
3
Journal of Controlled Release
39 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
5.0%
4
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
5.0%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 22%
5.0%
6
Soft Matter
50 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.4%
7
Acta Biomaterialia
85 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.4%
8
Interface Focus
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
9
Advanced Functional Materials
41 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
2.4%
10
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.4%
11
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
50% of probability mass above
12
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.9%
13
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 29%
1.9%
14
npj Systems Biology and Applications
99 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.8%
15
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
16
Development
440 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
17
Journal of Structural Biology
58 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
18
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.5%
19
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.5%
20
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.5%
21
ACS Synthetic Biology
256 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
22
ACS Omega
90 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
23
Advanced Materials
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
24
ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering
37 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.0%
25
Evolutionary Applications
91 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.0%
26
Journal of Colloid and Interface Science
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
27
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.9%
28
Biomaterials Science
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
29
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
30
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%