Back

Infective Endocarditis Prophylaxis Practices in Pediatric and Congenital Patients with Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices: An International PACES Survey

Batra, A. S.; Hamidy, M.; McCanta, A. C.; Sell, L.; Silka, M.

2026-02-09 cardiovascular medicine
10.64898/2026.02.05.26345706 medRxiv
Show abstract

Structured AbstractO_ST_ABSBackgroundC_ST_ABSGuideline recommendations for infective endocarditis (IE) prophylaxis have narrowed significantly over the past decade. However, these recommendations are derived from adult data and may not adequately account for the unique risk factors for IE in pediatric and congenital heart disease (CHD) patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs). ObjectiveTo characterize contemporary IE cases and prophylaxis practices among members of the Pediatric and Congenital Electrophysiology Society (PACES) and assess how these practices align with or diverge from current international guidelines or practice recommendations. MethodsA cross-sectional, web-based survey was distributed to PACES members worldwide. Questions addressed prophylaxis practices for CIED implantation, reinterventions, and bacteremia-inducing procedures, as well as clinician experience with IE in patients with CIED. Responses were analyzed descriptively. ResultsSubstantial practice heterogeneity was identified across multiple clinical scenarios. Although most clinicians aligned with guideline recommendations for patients with structurally normal hearts, nearly all respondents (92.3%) reported recommending lifelong prophylaxis for patients with complex or repaired CHD. Among 35 reported IE cases, 97% occurred in transvenous systems, 77% occurred >6 months post-implantation, and 90% lacked a clear procedural or infectious trigger. Despite successful device extraction in 77% of cases, significant morbidity and mortality were observed. ConclusionCurrent practice patterns among pediatric and congenital electrophysiologists reflect uncertainty regarding the applicability of adult-derived IE prophylaxis guidelines to younger patients with CIEDs. High observed morbidity, long-term device exposure, and distinct anatomic considerations highlight the need for pediatric-specific risk stratification and updated guidance.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
The American Journal of Cardiology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.2%
2
Circulation
66 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
9.9%
3
Heart
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.9%
4
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
8.9%
5
Heart Rhythm
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.9%
6
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 32%
4.7%
50% of probability mass above
7
BMJ
49 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.5%
8
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
9
Open Heart
19 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.5%
10
JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
11
European Heart Journal - Digital Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.7%
12
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
14 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.1%
13
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.8%
14
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
15
International Journal of Cardiology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.6%
16
Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine
42 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.6%
17
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
18
Stroke: Vascular and Interventional Neurology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
19
European Heart Journal
16 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
20
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 72%
0.9%
21
The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
22
Vaccine
189 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
23
Critical Care Explorations
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
24
British Journal of Anaesthesia
14 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
25
Canadian Medical Association Journal
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
26
Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology
39 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
27
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
28
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 66%
0.6%
29
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
49 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%