Back

Reducing suicide attempts with a compounded Brief Contact Intervention: a nationwide study of the VigilanS project, France

WANG, X. X.

2026-02-06 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.64898/2026.02.05.26345598
Show abstract

BackgroundSuicide prevention has become a global public health priority, and Brief Contact Interventions (BCI) following suicide attempts (SA) are an important tool for preventing suicides. The VigilanS project was designed to generalize compounded BCIs at the entire population level., It involves resource cards, telephone calls, and mailings, following a predefined algorithm. It has been implemented progressively in France, on a region-by-region basis, since 2015. ObjectiveTo evaluate the effectiveness of VigilanS in reducing suicide attempts among patients aged 18 years and older, and to explore potential differences in effectiveness by sex, age, and geographical location. MethodsThe study used data from the French national hospitalization database, PMSI-MCO. It included all patients over age 18 who were admitted to general hospitals for suicide attempts, between 2012 and 2022. Time-to-event ("survival") analysis of a second SA after a first one was performed; patients whose first SA occurred before VigilanS implementation were compared with their after-VigilanS counterparts. Six regions, with implementation occurring between 2015 and 2017, are analyzed here. ResultsThe differences in distribution of time-to-new-SA among patients before and after VigilanS implementation were statistically significant in all six regions under scope (log-rank test: P<0.0001). The Cox regression analysis revealed that VigilanS was significantly associated with a reduced risk of reattempting suicide in all regions. Age consistently showed a negative association with reattempting suicide. ConclusionVigilanS is likely effective in reducing suicide attempts among patients aged 18 years and older in France. This suggests that implementing BCIs following SAs in general hospitals at a population-wide level can contribute to reducing suicide rates and provides real-world evidence (RWE).

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 17%
21.1%
2
BMJ Open
based on 553 papers
Top 17%
6.8%
3
The British Journal of Psychiatry
based on 21 papers
Top 0.5%
5.7%
4
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
based on 116 papers
Top 3%
5.7%
5
Journal of Affective Disorders
based on 72 papers
Top 2%
4.8%
6
Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences
based on 10 papers
Top 0.1%
4.8%
7
PLOS Medicine
based on 95 papers
Top 2%
4.1%
50% of probability mass above
8
Psychiatry Research
based on 33 papers
Top 2%
3.0%
9
BMJ Mental Health
based on 15 papers
Top 0.5%
2.5%
10
Frontiers in Psychiatry
based on 56 papers
Top 4%
2.0%
11
BJPsych Open
based on 24 papers
Top 1%
1.7%
12
JAMA Network Open
based on 125 papers
Top 10%
1.7%
13
Frontiers in Public Health
based on 135 papers
Top 16%
1.7%
14
Journal of Medical Internet Research
based on 81 papers
Top 9%
1.7%
15
JMIR Research Protocols
based on 18 papers
Top 1%
1.7%
16
Public Health in Practice
based on 11 papers
Top 0.4%
1.4%
17
Journal of Psychiatric Research
based on 22 papers
Top 2%
1.4%
18
BMC Health Services Research
based on 43 papers
Top 3%
1.3%
19
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
based on 11 papers
Top 1%
1.3%
20
Scientific Reports
based on 701 papers
Top 82%
0.9%
21
The Lancet Regional Health - Europe
based on 32 papers
Top 1%
0.9%
22
Psychological Medicine
based on 52 papers
Top 6%
0.9%
23
Schizophrenia Research
based on 11 papers
Top 1%
0.7%
24
Acta Neuropsychiatrica
based on 11 papers
Top 2%
0.7%
25
eClinicalMedicine
based on 55 papers
Top 6%
0.7%
26
Nature Medicine
based on 88 papers
Top 17%
0.7%
27
Public Health
based on 34 papers
Top 8%
0.7%
28
PLOS Global Public Health
based on 287 papers
Top 22%
0.7%