Back

A novel RNA nucleic acid amplification test more accurately distinguishes active Clostridioides difficile infection from colonization

Long, K. D.; Silberger, D. J.; Hernandez, J.; Detchemendy, T.; Moates, D.; Abdalla, T.; Hastings, L. E.; Jani, A.; Kim, J.; Prados, M.; Miller, M. B.; Rodriguez, J. M.; Leal, S. M.

2026-02-06 infectious diseases
10.64898/2026.02.05.25342495 medRxiv
Show abstract

Clostridioides difficile (C. diff) is a leading cause of hospital-acquired infections with severity ranging from mild diarrhea to fulminant colitis and death. Current antigen tests lack adequate sensitivity and DNA-based nucleic acid amplification tests (DNA-NAATs) exhibit limited specificity for active infection, leading to either underdiagnosis or inappropriate treatment of colonized individuals. Unlike DNA, mRNA is expressed only by metabolically active bacteria and is rapidly hydrolyzed, providing natural advantages to distinguish active infection from colonization. In this study, we developed and evaluated a novel multiplexed reverse-transcriptase PCR assay (RNA-NAAT) targeting C. diff-specific sequences. No cross-reactivity was observed with other gastrointestinal pathogens, commensal enteric flora, or closely-related Clostridioides or Clostridium species. Toxin gene RNA expression was detected only in samples spiked with metabolically active C. diff at a limit of detection 30-to-50-fold less than current diagnostic methods. Sequential clinical samples (n=260) were collected in proprietary RNA-preservative solution from patients receiving standard of care C. diff diagnostic testing. All samples were evaluated with RNA-NAAT, Alere GDH/toxin EIA, Solana DNA-NAAT, and both forward- and reverse-2-Step Algorithms (2-SA). Samples yielding valid results on all platforms (n=239) with discordant test results (n=14) were adjudicated via toxigenic culture and blinded chart review by infectious disease physicians. RNA-NAAT outperformed all comparator test strategies, simultaneously exhibiting higher sensitivity and specificity, including a higher specificity for active infection than the specific toxin EIA (99.5% vs 98.2%) and a higher sensitivity for organism identification than the sensitive DNA-NAAT (100% vs 88.2%), with significantly reduced false positive test results (1 vs 7). One Sentence SummaryA novel RNA diagnostic distinguishes clinically-relevant C. difficile infection from toxigenic carrier states, improving sensitivity and specificity.

Published in Clinical Infectious Diseases (predicted rank #10) · training set

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.