Back

A novel RNA nucleic acid amplification test more accurately distinguishes active Clostridioides difficile infection from colonization

Long, K. D.; Silberger, D. J.; Hernandez, J.; Detchemendy, T.; Moates, D.; Abdalla, T.; Hastings, L. E.; Jani, A.; Kim, J.; Prados, M.; Miller, M. B.; Rodriguez, J. M.; Leal, S. M.

2026-02-06 infectious diseases
10.64898/2026.02.05.25342495 medRxiv
Show abstract

Clostridioides difficile (C. diff) is a leading cause of hospital-acquired infections with severity ranging from mild diarrhea to fulminant colitis and death. Current antigen tests lack adequate sensitivity and DNA-based nucleic acid amplification tests (DNA-NAATs) exhibit limited specificity for active infection, leading to either underdiagnosis or inappropriate treatment of colonized individuals. Unlike DNA, mRNA is expressed only by metabolically active bacteria and is rapidly hydrolyzed, providing natural advantages to distinguish active infection from colonization. In this study, we developed and evaluated a novel multiplexed reverse-transcriptase PCR assay (RNA-NAAT) targeting C. diff-specific sequences. No cross-reactivity was observed with other gastrointestinal pathogens, commensal enteric flora, or closely-related Clostridioides or Clostridium species. Toxin gene RNA expression was detected only in samples spiked with metabolically active C. diff at a limit of detection 30-to-50-fold less than current diagnostic methods. Sequential clinical samples (n=260) were collected in proprietary RNA-preservative solution from patients receiving standard of care C. diff diagnostic testing. All samples were evaluated with RNA-NAAT, Alere GDH/toxin EIA, Solana DNA-NAAT, and both forward- and reverse-2-Step Algorithms (2-SA). Samples yielding valid results on all platforms (n=239) with discordant test results (n=14) were adjudicated via toxigenic culture and blinded chart review by infectious disease physicians. RNA-NAAT outperformed all comparator test strategies, simultaneously exhibiting higher sensitivity and specificity, including a higher specificity for active infection than the specific toxin EIA (99.5% vs 98.2%) and a higher sensitivity for organism identification than the sensitive DNA-NAAT (100% vs 88.2%), with significantly reduced false positive test results (1 vs 7). One Sentence SummaryA novel RNA diagnostic distinguishes clinically-relevant C. difficile infection from toxigenic carrier states, improving sensitivity and specificity.

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
120 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
51.7%
50% of probability mass above
2
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
7.2%
3
The Lancet Microbe
43 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.8%
4
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 44%
2.6%
5
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
6
Med
38 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
7
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
8
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
9
Emerging Infectious Diseases
103 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
10
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
11
mSphere
281 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
12
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.2%
13
New England Journal of Medicine
50 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
14
Journal of Clinical Virology
62 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
15
Nature Microbiology
133 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
16
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 71%
0.9%
17
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
18
The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics
36 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
19
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.8%
20
Gastroenterology
40 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
21
Clinical Chemistry
22 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
22
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%