Back

Effect of Cold Ischemia Time and Fixative preparation on Breast Cancer Biomarker Expression: Implications for Resource-Limited Settings

NDENGUE, C. P.; ATEBA, G. R.; ATANGANA, P. J. A.; MANDENGUE, S. H.; MBOUDOU, E. T.; EBOUMBOU MOUKOKO, C. E.

2026-02-09 pathology
10.64898/2026.02.04.703805 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundOptimal pre-analytical management of breast tissue specimens, particularly formalin fixation, is essential for accurate immunohistochemical (IHC) biomarker assessment in invasive breast cancer. Although international guidelines suggest using 4% neutral buffered formalin with controlled fixation time, many laboratories in low-resource settings deviate from these standards. This study aimed to determine whether fixative preparation (4% neutral buffered formaldehyde vs. 4% non-buffered formaldehyde) and cold ischemia time impact the preservation and evaluation of tissue biomarkers in invasive breast cancer. MethodsWe conducted an experimental study using fresh mastectomy tissue from a 34-year-old patient with invasive ductal carcinoma (pT4, hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative, Ki67=40%) who had not received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Fifty microsamples (5-15 mm in length, 1 mm in width) were obtained and divided into four cohorts: (1) 19 samples fixed in 4% neutral buffered formaldehyde for 0.5 to 144 hours; (2) 19 samples fixed in 4% non-buffered formaldehyde for 0.5 to 144 hours; (3) 6 samples with delayed fixation (0.5 to 8 hours) then fixed in neutral buffered formaldehyde for 10 hours; (4) 6 samples with delayed fixation (0.5 to 8 hours) then fixed in non-buffered formaldehyde for 10 hours. Hormone receptors (estrogen receptor-ER, progesterone receptor-PR) and Ki67 expression were evaluated by IHC using the Allred scoring system and current international recommendations. ResultsFixative preparation had a statistically significant, yet minimal, biological impact on biomarker evaluation. The mean percentage of ER-positive cells was 96.89{+/-}0.74% with neutral buffered formaldehyde compared to 94.32{+/-}1.51% with non-buffered formaldehyde (p=0.011). Similar trends were seen for PR (94.89{+/-}0.95% vs. 92.63{+/-}1.67%, p=0.027) and staining intensity. However, Allred scores remained constant. Cold ischemia time was strongly correlated with decreased biomarker expression regardless of fixative preparation. Hormone receptor expression and Ki67 remained stable with minimal Allred score changes for up to 2 hours of cold ischemia, but significantly decreased after 2 hours, with scores decreasing in proportion to the duration of ischemia (p<0.05). ConclusionsNon-buffered formaldehyde preserves tissue biomarkers almost as effectively as neutral buffered formaldehyde for IHC analysis. Following guidelines, a cold ischemia time of up to 1 hour is still a wise standard to guarantee accurate biomarker assessment. These results are significant for pathology laboratories in resource-limited settings where neutral buffered formalin may not be easily accessible.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 11%
17.6%
2
Journal of Clinical Pathology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.4%
3
JNCI Cancer Spectrum
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.8%
4
Modern Pathology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
5
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.3%
6
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.9%
50% of probability mass above
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 27%
4.3%
8
Laboratory Investigation
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
9
Journal of Pathology Informatics
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
10
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
11
The American Journal of Pathology
31 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
12
Breast Cancer Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.6%
13
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
14
The Journal of Pathology
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
15
International Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.5%
16
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
17
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence
18 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
18
BMC Cancer
52 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
19
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
20
Frontiers in Veterinary Science
30 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
21
Molecular Oncology
50 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
22
npj Breast Cancer
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%