Back

Using Artificial Intelligence to optimize agreement between interstitial sensors and capillary puncture in glycemic assessment and classification

Ecker, L. R.; de Santana, N. A. C.; Caldato, C. F.; Teixeira, C. E.

2026-02-05 endocrinology
10.64898/2026.02.04.26345595 medRxiv
Show abstract

IntroductionBlood glucose monitoring is essential for the management of diabetes mellitus. Continuous interstitial glucose (IG) monitoring systems are less invasive than capillary blood glucose (BG) measurements, but their agreement decreases at higher glucose levels. Artificial intelligence (AI) approaches, particularly recurrent neural networks such as long short-term memory (LSTM), have shown potential to model temporal glucose dynamics and correct inter-method discrepancies. Objective: To develop and validate an AI-based model capable of predicting capillary BG values from IG data, improving agreement between methods and enhancing glycemic status classification. Methods: This retrospective observational study analyzed 708 paired BG-IG measurements obtained from published anonymized datasets. Data preprocessing included Kalman filtering, robust normalization, temporal windowing, and class balancing via oversampling. An LSTM model with dual output was trained to perform both capillary glucose regression and glycemic status classification. Model performance was assessed using regression metrics (MAE, RMSE, R2), classification metrics (accuracy, F1-score), and agreement analysis (Bland-Altman). Results: The AI model substantially reduced the mean bias from +16.27 mg/dL to -2.08 mg/dL and achieved markedly narrower limits of agreement compared with raw BG-IG differences (-129.5 to +162.0 mg/dL vs. -47.3 to +43.2 mg/dL). Glycemic classification accuracy was high for hyperglycemia (94.6%), prediabetes (93.7%) and normoglycemia (100%), with lower performance observed for hypoglycemia (66.7%). Conclusion: LSTM-based AI modeling demonstrated strong capability to predict capillary BG from IG measurements and to correct inter-method discordance. These findings support the potential integration of AI-enhanced glucose estimation into clinical monitoring systems to improve therapeutic decision-making.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 3%
14.3%
2
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
8.4%
3
Metabolites
50 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.2%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 29%
6.3%
5
Expert Systems with Applications
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
6
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.3%
7
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.3%
50% of probability mass above
8
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.6%
9
Frontiers in Endocrinology
53 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.6%
10
Bioengineering
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.1%
11
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.8%
12
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
13
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
35 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
14
JMIR Medical Informatics
17 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
15
BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care
15 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
16
JAMIA Open
37 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.5%
17
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 57%
1.2%
18
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 21%
0.9%
19
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
20
Diabetologia
36 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
21
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
22
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 17%
0.9%
23
Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
24
Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism
17 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
25
Communications Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
26
Diabetes Care
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
27
npj Systems Biology and Applications
99 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
28
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
60 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
29
Journal of Pathology Informatics
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
30
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
49 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%