Back

Uncertainty-aware personalized estimation of Parkinsons disease severity from longitudinal speech

Shahriar, K. A.

2026-02-05 health informatics
10.64898/2026.02.04.26345576 medRxiv
Show abstract

Parkinsons disease is a progressive neurological disorder characterized by motor impairments whose severity is commonly assessed using the Unified Parkinsons Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS). Although clinically established, UPDRS assessment requires in-person evaluation by trained specialists and is inherently subjective, limiting its suitability for frequent monitoring. Speech production is affected early in Parkinsons disease and provides a non-invasive modality for remote symptom assessment. In this study, an uncertainty-aware personalized framework is proposed for estimating Parkinsons disease severity from speech signals. The approach integrates longitudinal temporal modeling of longitudinal speech recordings with patient-specific representations and a probabilistic latent disease state. Continuous motor UPDRS scores are estimated jointly with ordinal disease severity stages, enabling both fine-grained regression and clinically interpretable stratification. Predictive uncertainty is explicitly quantified, yielding confidence-aware severity estimates suitable for telemonitoring applications. The method is evaluated on a longitudinal speech dataset using a strict patient-wise split, ensuring that all test subjects are unseen during training. On the held-out test set, the proposed model achieves high predictive accuracy (mean absolute error 0.56 UPDRS points, root mean squared error 0.74, and coefficient of determination R2 = 0.99) for motor UPDRS estimation. Ordinal severity classification attains an accuracy of 0.92 across mild, moderate, and severe disease stages. Comparative experiments against classical machine learning methods and global temporal baselines demonstrate consistent performance improvements.These results indicate that personalized, uncertainty-aware modeling of speech signals can support accurate and clinically meaningful remote monitoring of Parkinsons disease severity.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
19.6%
2
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
34 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.4%
3
Sensors
39 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.9%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 31%
4.9%
5
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.0%
6
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.6%
7
Frontiers in Digital Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
8
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.1%
9
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.1%
10
Journal of Neural Engineering
197 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.6%
11
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.6%
12
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 46%
2.1%
13
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
38 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.8%
14
Scientific Data
174 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
15
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
28 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
16
Biomedical Signal Processing and Control
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
17
Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
18
European Respiratory Journal
54 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
19
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.2%
20
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
21
Medical Image Analysis
33 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
22
npj Parkinson's Disease
89 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.8%
23
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
24
Nature Machine Intelligence
61 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
25
Translational Psychiatry
219 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
26
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
27
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 33%
0.6%
28
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 37%
0.6%
29
Cognitive Neurodynamics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%
30
Biology Methods and Protocols
53 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%