Back

"Lived Experiences, Impacts, and Coping Strategies During COVID-19: A Qualitative Study of Frontline Health Care Workers in a Zonal Hospital in Northern Tanzania"

Mhando, L. J.; Mushi, D. L.; Tucho, G. T.; Draebel, T. A.; Andersen, L. S.; Kavishe, R.

2026-02-06 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.64898/2026.02.04.26345569 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic significantly changed the daily routines of frontline health workers (FLHW), particularly those directly caring for COVID-19 patients. This study explores the lived experiences and coping strategies of FLHW at a Zonal Hospital in Kilimanjaro, Tanzania MethodThe study used a qualitative exploratory descriptive design, to retrospectively capture psychological impacts, challenges, coping strategies, and professional dilemmas faced by FLHW. Participants were purposively sampled from KCMC Hospital departments directly involved in COVID-19 patient care. FindingsThe FLHW experienced considerable fear, stress, and stigma. The fear of infection and high mortality rates among patients and colleagues heightened their anxiety. Stress was exacerbated by long working hours, uncomfortable personal protective equipment (PPE), poor remuneration, and the emotional toll of witnessing numerous deaths. FLHW also experienced being stigmatized and discriminated against, both within their workplaces, within the family and in the broader community. Some FLHW considered quitting their jobs due to the overwhelming workload, fear of being infected, and emotional strain. Additionally, absenteeism and avoidance of COVID-19 duties were common, driven by fear and inadequate hospital capacity. Coping strategies among FLHW to manage their stress and maintain resilience included acceptance, faith, family support, rest, and, the use of recreational substances. ConclusionThe FLHW experienced considerable fear, stress, and stigma. The study highlights the need for better psychological support, improved communication, adequate training, and resources to support FLHW before, during, and post-pandemic. Enhanced resilience and confidence, along with a greater appreciation for protective measures and compassion for patients, were some of the key lessons learned from their experiences during the pandemic informing more effective preparedness care in future pandemics.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 2%
35.6%
2
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 2%
8.7%
3
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
7.1%
50% of probability mass above
4
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 1%
5.0%
5
Public Health
34 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.1%
6
Epidemiology and Infection
84 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.8%
7
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.7%
8
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.5%
9
Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
10
Public Health in Practice
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
11
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
12
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
13
Healthcare
16 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.5%
14
Frontiers in Psychology
49 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.4%
15
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
16
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
17
BMC Medical Education
20 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.0%
18
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness
16 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
19
BMJ Global Health
98 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
20
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
60 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
21
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
22
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
23
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 75%
0.7%
24
Journal of Infection and Public Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
25
BJPsych Open
25 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
26
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 17%
0.7%
27
Wellcome Open Research
57 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
28
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%