Front-Line Decision-Making: A Thematic Analysis of Interviews with Hospital Staff on Referrals, Admissions, and Care for People with Multiple Long Term Conditions
Pretorius, S.; Bellass, S.; Cooper, R.; Evision, F.; Gallier, S.; Howe, N.; Sapey, E.; Sheppard, A.; Suklan, J.; Sayer, A. A.; Witham, M. D.
Show abstract
BackgroundMultiple long-term conditions (MLTC) are increasingly common and place significant strain on healthcare systems designed around single-organ conditions, often resulting in fragmented and reactive care for people living with MLTC. There is limited understanding of how health care professionals (HCPs) make decisions for and with individuals with MLTC at the point of hospital presentation. This study examined how HCPs in emergency and acute settings make decisions around pathways and places of care for people with MLTC, exploring the factors that shape clinical judgement, the challenges HCPs navigate in practice and structures that influence clinical decision-making. MethodsWe conducted semi-structured, individual interviews with 40 NHS professionals working in emergency departments (EDs) and acute assessment units across multiple regions, roles, and specialties. Participants included consultant physicians, resident doctors, senior nursing staff and allied health professionals. Interviews focused on how decisions were made around referrals, admissions, and care planning for people with MLTC. Data were analysed thematically using an inductive approach. ResultsFour themes were identified: A journey of uncertainty, Within and beyond limitations, Structures of care and Implementing relational care. Clinical decision-making is shaped by clinical uncertainty, limited resources, care approaches, and interpersonal relationships and communication. Fragmented services and single-disease pathways complicate care, but participants highlighted the value of continuity, communication, and relational approaches. Challenges include resource limitations, rigid pathways and limited community support. Key enablers of clinical decision-making include integrated care, ownership, and early conversations about priorities. ConclusionsClinical decision-making by HCPs in hospitals for patients with MLTC is complex and shaped by systemic misalignment, where clinical realities clash with health system structures. Improving clinical decision-making around referrals, admissions and care planning for people with MLTC will require adapting systems and training to reflect the realities of MLTC. Potentially beneficial adaptations include strengthening relational and multidisciplinary approaches and expanding intermediate care to reduce avoidable admissions.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Patients’ and carers’ experiences of, and engagement with remote home monitoring services for COVID-19 patients: a rapid mixed-methods study 96%
- “I don’t know what to do or where to go”. Experiences of accessing healthcare support from the perspectives of people living with Long Covid and healthcare professionals: A qualitative study in Bradford, UK 96%
- Challenges of visibility and inclusion in Long COVID: a population-based interview study 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- The Impact on Staff of Providing Non-Invasive Advanced Respiratory Support During the Covid-19 Pandemic A Qualitative Study in an Acute Hospital 96%
- Support and follow-up needs of patients discharged from Intensive Care after severe COVID-19: a mixed-methods study of the views of UK general practitioners and intensive care staff during the pandemic’s first wave 95%
- Understanding good communication in ambulance pre-alerts to Emergency Department. Findings from a qualitative study of UK emergency services 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- An observational study of survival outcomes of people referred for ‘fast-track’ end-of-life care funding in a District General Hospital; too little too late? 95%
- National statutory reporting: not even ticking the boxes? The quality of ‘Learning from Deaths’ reporting in Quality Accounts within the NHS in England 2017-2020 94%
- “We tend to get pad happy” : a qualitative study of health practitioners’ perspectives on continence care for older people in hospital 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- A mixed-methods multi-site case study of a person-centred intervention for constant observation in hospitals with people living with dementia 95%
- A qualitative exploration of barriers to efficient and effective Structured Medication Reviews in Primary Care: Findings from the DynAIRx study 95%
- Uncertainty in serious illness: A national interdisciplinary consensus exercise to identify clinical research priorities 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Navigating uncertain illness trajectories for young children with serious infectious illness: a mixed-methods modified grounded theory study 95%
- A qualitative investigation of crisis cafés in England: their role, implementation, and accessibility 93%
- ‘Beyond Places of Safety’ – a qualitative study exploring the implementation of mental health crisis care innovations across England 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.