Back

Front-Line Decision-Making: A Thematic Analysis of Interviews with Hospital Staff on Referrals, Admissions, and Care for People with Multiple Long Term Conditions

Pretorius, S.; Bellass, S.; Cooper, R.; Evision, F.; Gallier, S.; Howe, N.; Sapey, E.; Sheppard, A.; Suklan, J.; Sayer, A. A.; Witham, M. D.

2026-02-09 health systems and quality improvement
10.64898/2026.02.04.26345456 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundMultiple long-term conditions (MLTC) are increasingly common and place significant strain on healthcare systems designed around single-organ conditions, often resulting in fragmented and reactive care for people living with MLTC. There is limited understanding of how health care professionals (HCPs) make decisions for and with individuals with MLTC at the point of hospital presentation. This study examined how HCPs in emergency and acute settings make decisions around pathways and places of care for people with MLTC, exploring the factors that shape clinical judgement, the challenges HCPs navigate in practice and structures that influence clinical decision-making. MethodsWe conducted semi-structured, individual interviews with 40 NHS professionals working in emergency departments (EDs) and acute assessment units across multiple regions, roles, and specialties. Participants included consultant physicians, resident doctors, senior nursing staff and allied health professionals. Interviews focused on how decisions were made around referrals, admissions, and care planning for people with MLTC. Data were analysed thematically using an inductive approach. ResultsFour themes were identified: A journey of uncertainty, Within and beyond limitations, Structures of care and Implementing relational care. Clinical decision-making is shaped by clinical uncertainty, limited resources, care approaches, and interpersonal relationships and communication. Fragmented services and single-disease pathways complicate care, but participants highlighted the value of continuity, communication, and relational approaches. Challenges include resource limitations, rigid pathways and limited community support. Key enablers of clinical decision-making include integrated care, ownership, and early conversations about priorities. ConclusionsClinical decision-making by HCPs in hospitals for patients with MLTC is complex and shaped by systemic misalignment, where clinical realities clash with health system structures. Improving clinical decision-making around referrals, admissions and care planning for people with MLTC will require adapting systems and training to reflect the realities of MLTC. Potentially beneficial adaptations include strengthening relational and multidisciplinary approaches and expanding intermediate care to reduce avoidable admissions.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BMJ Open Quality
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.5%
2
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 1%
14.4%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 25%
6.8%
4
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
5
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.3%
50% of probability mass above
6
Health Expectations
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
7
British Journal of General Practice
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
8
Journal of General Internal Medicine
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.3%
9
Emergency Medicine Journal
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
10
BJGP Open
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.1%
11
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.4%
12
BJPsych Open
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
13
BMJ Health & Care Informatics
13 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
14
CMAJ Open
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.3%
15
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
16
Journal of Clinical Pathology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
17
JMIRx Med
31 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
18
Canadian Medical Association Journal
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
19
Genetics in Medicine
69 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
20
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
21
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
39 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%