Personalised approach to hypertension treatment: Rationale and design of the HYPERMARKER randomised trial
Chapman, M.; Knikman, J. E.; Mobley, A.; Lagerwaard, B.; Martinez-Garcia, F.; Zeitouny, S.; Engler, D.; Schnabel, R. B.; Spiering, W.; Bos, I. D.; Champsi, A.; Carter, A. W.; Hankemeier, T.; Grobbee, D. E.; Kotecha, D.; The HYPERMARKER Consortium,
Show abstract
Background and ObjectiveBlood pressure treatment response is variable in individual patients, and the choice of medical therapy is often dependent on clinician experience. Treatment choices can be personalised by patient empowerment, metabolomic profiles and augmented by machine learning, but robust evaluation is lacking on how these can be combined to enhance clinical effectiveness. The HYPERMARKER trial will evaluate how an individualised choice of medication class can address the avoidable global health and economic burdens of hypertension. Design and InterventionThe HYPERMARKER trial is a proof-of-concept, pragmatic, multicentre, adaptive, open-label strategy trial embedded into routine clinical practice with stratified individual patient randomisation. The trial was co-designed with a patient and public involvement team. The intervention is a digital portal that supports shared decision making on hypertension therapy class using clinical features plus metabolomic profiles determined with liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. Participants and OutcomesEligible patients are aged [≥]18yrs with a systolic blood pressure [≥]140mmHg and a clinical indication for antihypertensive therapy. 400 participants will be randomised to usual standard of care for treatment selection, or to the intervention group. Remote follow-up will occur through a patient smartphone application and linked blood pressure monitor to assess the primary outcome of change in home systolic blood pressure during a four-week period after medication changes. Secondary outcomes will include patient-reported adverse effects and quality of life, treatment withdrawal, healthcare utilisation and a health economic analysis. In the second phase of the trial, all participants will receive an updated version of the intervention, regardless of original randomised group. Ethics and DisseminationEthical approval will be obtained for all sites. Approval in England: North West - Greater Manchester West Research Ethics Committee (REC) (25/NW/0296). Trial results will be disseminated via peer-reviewed publications and plain language patient summaries. Trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov: NCT07294794; ISRCTN: ISRCTN29385951. STRENGTH AND LIMITATIONS OF THIS STUDYO_LIHypertension is a major cause of preventable morbidity and mortality, and this study aims to reduce those burdens through machine learning-based integration of metabolomics with clinical factors to enable better personalisation of blood pressure lowering therapy. C_LIO_LIThe HYPERMARKER trial was co-created with patient and public representatives, using digital technology with remote monitoring to facilitate a high level of shared care and patient empowerment. C_LIO_LIHYPERMARKER is a pragmatic proof-of-concept randomised trial designed to evaluate the potential for future pharmacometabolomic strategies to aid clinical decision-making. C_LI
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Real-world effects of ACE inhibitors and Angiotensin Receptor Blockers: protocol for an emulation study of the ONTARGET trial using electronic health records 95%
- Cohort profile: The LipidCardio Study - Role of Lipoproteins in Cardiovascular Disease 92%
- The iDiabetes Platform: Enhanced Phenotyping of Patients with Diabetes for Precision Diagnosis, Prognosis and Treatment- study protocol for a cluster-randomised controlled study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Effect of a mobile health intervention optimised with artificial intelligence on blood pressure and other cardiovascular risk factors in adults with high blood pressure: Rationale and design of My Intelligent Cardiac Assistant (MICArdiac) Randomised Controlled Trial 95%
- Impact of COVID-19 on recorded blood pressure screening and hypertension management in England: An analysis of monthly changes in Quality and Outcomes Framework indicators in OpenSAFELY 95%
- Effectiveness of An Impedance Cardiography Guided Treatment Strategy to Improve Blood Pressure Control in A Real-World Setting: Results from A Pilot Pragmatic Clinical Trial 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Hypertension Management Dynamics in Pediatric CKD: Insights from the 4C Study 95%
- Trends in Awareness, Antihypertensive Medication Use and Blood Pressure Control by Race and Ethnicity Among Adults with Hypertension in the United States: A National Health and Nutrition Examination Analysis from 2011 to 2018 93%
- Projected Impact of Nonpharmacologic Management of Stage 1 Hypertension Among Lower-Risk US Adults 92%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Exposure to Renin-Angiotensin System Inhibitors Is Associated with Reduced Mortality of Older Hypertensive Covid-19 Patients 93%
- Factors Associated with Treatment-Resistant Hypertension: Results of a prospective observational Study 93%
- Differences between brachial and aortic blood pressure in adolescence and their impact on classification of hypertension 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.