Back

SGLT2 inhibitor use in type 2 diabetes in England: a population-based cohort study of uptake of NICE guidance

Muller, P.; Wray, J.; Rahman, M.; Hawkins, J.; Bakhai, C.; Cuthbertson, D. J.; Willans, R.; Yelland, E.; Rowark, S.; Watras, M.; Rains, L. S.; Adler, A. I.; Owen, L.

2026-03-16 epidemiology
10.64898/2026.02.04.26343917 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectivesAn update to the NICE Type 2 diabetes (T2DM) guideline in February 2022 recommended an SGLT2 inhibitor be offered to people with cardiovascular disease (CVD) or heart failure (HF) as comorbidities and considered for people at high CVD risk. We report uptake of this guideline in England 18 months after its publication. DesignObservational cohort study. SettingGeneral practices contributing to the Clinical Practice Research Data Link, linked to hospital admission records. Participants587,826 people aged over 18 years with T2DM on 1st September 2023, stratified according to their CVD category (CVD only; HF only; CVD and HF; high CVD risk score; low CVD risk score) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) status, and further by age, gender, ethnicity, deprivation, and T2DM diagnosis duration. Main outcome measuresPercentage of patients with a current SGLT2 inhibitor prescription; odds ratios for association between patient characteristics and a current prescription. ResultsIn people with T2DM, the percentage with a current SGLT2 inhibitor prescription was 19.5% for people with CVD, 29.4% for people with HF, 30.5% for people with both CVD and HF, and 19.9% and 20.2% respectively for people at high and low CVD risk. In age-stratified analyses, uptake ordered from lowest to highest was as follows: low CVD risk score, high CVD risk score, CVD only, HF only, CVD and HF. In models adjusted for clinical and patient characteristics uptake was lower in people aged >60, women, Black people, and people living in areas of higher deprivation. ConclusionsWhilst prescribing of SGLT2 inhibitors continues to rise in England, an opportunity remains to increase uptake and to reduce inequalities in people with T2DM in 2026. We report inequalities by ethnicity and deprivation, and lower uptake for people with CVD without HF than people with HF, despite an equal guideline recommendation for these two groups. Additional evidence is needed on the effectiveness of SGLT2 inhibitors in frailer populations. What is already known on this topic?O_LIIn 2020 approximately 10% of people with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) and cardiovascular disease (CVD) and 14% of people with T2DM but without CVD in England had a current SGLT2 inhibitor prescription. C_LIO_LIIn February 2022 NICE recommended that an SGLT2 inhibitor should be offered to people with T2DM with heart failure or CVD, and considered for people with T2DM at high risk of CVD; network meta-analyses have found 10% to 40% lower odds of cardiovascular mortality with treatment in these groups. C_LIO_LIUptake of NICE guidelines in general practice has historically been variable, although higher when accompanied by pay-for-performance schemes such as the Quality and Outcomes Framework. C_LI What this study addsO_LIBy September 2023 the percentage of people with T2DM with a current SGLT2 inhibitor prescription had reached 19.5% in those with CVD as a comorbidity, 30.5% in those with heart failure, and 19.9% in those at high risk of CVD. C_LIO_LIWomen, people of Black ethnicity, and people living in areas of high deprivation had lower odds of a current prescription in analyses adjusted for age, gender, cardiovascular comorbidity, and renal function. C_LI How might these results change the focus of research or clinical practice?O_LIThe results highlight the need for ongoing surveillance of uptake of NICE-recommended treatments for T2DM, and consideration of actions to address barriers to uptake. This is particularly important in the context of broader eligibility for SGLT2 inhibitor treatment in type 2 diabetes in England from 2026. C_LIO_LIThese results support the development of initiatives and quality improvement programmes to improve evidence-based prescribing and address inequalities between clinical and demographic subgroups. C_LI

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Diabetologia
36 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.5%
2
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.4%
3
BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.1%
4
Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
5
British Journal of General Practice
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
6
Diabetes Care
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
50% of probability mass above
7
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 5%
4.3%
8
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.2%
9
Circulation
66 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.1%
10
Wellcome Open Research
57 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
11
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
12
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
13
The Lancet Healthy Longevity
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.3%
14
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 56%
1.2%
15
Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
16
The Lancet Regional Health - Europe
32 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
17
Trials
25 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
18
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 66%
0.8%
19
Frontiers in Endocrinology
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
20
BMJ Nutrition, Prevention & Health
10 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
21
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
22
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
23
Public Health
34 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
24
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
25
Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
52 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
26
BMJ
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%