Back

Improved Ensemble Performance by Weight Optimisation for the Genomic Prediction of Maize Flowering Time Traits

Tomura, S.; Powell, O. M.; Wilkinson, M. J.; Lefevre, J.; Cooper, M.

2026-02-06 bioinformatics
10.64898/2026.02.03.703660 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Ensembles of multiple genomic prediction models have demonstrated improved prediction performance over the individual models contributing to the ensemble. The outperformance of ensemble models is expected from the Diversity Prediction Theorem, which states that for ensembles constructed with diverse prediction models, the ensemble prediction error becomes lower than the mean prediction error of the individual models. While a naive ensemble-average model provides baseline performance improvement by aggregating all individual prediction models with equal weights, optimising weights for each individual model could further enhance ensemble prediction performance. The weights can be optimised based on their level of informativeness regarding prediction error and diversity. Here, we evaluated weighted ensemble-average models with three possible weight optimisation approaches (linear transformation, Nelder-Mead and Bayesian) using flowering time traits from two maize nested associated mapping (NAM) datasets; TeoNAM and MaizeNAM. The three proposed weighted ensemble-average approaches improved prediction performance in several of the prediction scenarios investigated. In particular, the weighted ensemble models enhanced prediction performance when the adjusted weights differed substantially from the equal weights used by the naive ensemble models. For performance comparisons within the weighted ensembles, there was no clear superiority among the proposed approaches in both prediction accuracy and error across the prediction scenarios. Weight optimisation in ensembles warrants further investigation to explore the opportunities to improve their prediction performance; for example, integration of a weighted ensemble with a simultaneous hyperparameter tuning process may offer a promising direction for further research.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
26.4%
2
The Plant Genome
53 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.6%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 22%
5.0%
4
in silico Plants
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.4%
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 33%
4.4%
50% of probability mass above
6
Theoretical and Applied Genetics
46 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
7
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.7%
8
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 9%
3.7%
9
BMC Bioinformatics
383 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.9%
10
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.7%
11
Crop Science
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
12
Bioinformatics Advances
184 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
13
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.3%
14
Plant Phenomics
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
15
Heredity
53 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
16
Briefings in Bioinformatics
326 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
17
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
18
GigaScience
172 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
19
G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics
351 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
20
Horticulture Research
43 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
21
G3
33 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
22
Molecular Ecology Resources
161 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
23
G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics
222 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
24
Plant Direct
81 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
25
Gigabyte
60 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
26
Biology Methods and Protocols
53 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
27
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 17%
0.7%
28
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 17%
0.7%
29
Journal of Bioinformatics and Systems Biology
14 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
30
Agronomy
18 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%