Back

Visual - Acoustic Thigmotaxis in Zebrafish Larvae: A High throughput NAM for Neurotoxicity Assessment

Torres-Ruiz, M.; Munoz Palencia, M.; De La Vieja, A.; Canas Portilla, A. I.

2026-02-04 pharmacology and toxicology
10.64898/2026.02.03.703464 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The nervous system is highly vulnerable to chemical disruption, yet current regulatory guidelines do not include behavioral endpoints that capture changes in stress-related responses. Zebrafish larvae, up to 5 days old, have emerged as a promising model to bridge this gap, offering genetic and neurochemical similarity to humans together with high throughput potential. In this work, we have developed and evaluated a larval thigmotaxis assay as a new approach methodology (NAM) to detect behavioral alterations caused by neuroactive substances. Thigmotaxis, or edge-preference behavior, was studied in zebrafish larvae exposed to a range of model compounds and challenged with both visual (light/dark) and acoustic (sound/silence) stimuli. We compared 24 round well plates, commonly used in behavioral assays, with 96 square well plates to increase throughput. The two formats showed equivalent results, supporting the use of the higher-capacity system. Classical controls confirmed assay performance with caffeine increasing thigmotaxis, while diazepam decreased it. Additional neuroactive substances with diverse modes of action (chlorpyrifos, nicotine, dexamethasone, ethylenethiourea) produced stimulus-dependent responses, whereas negative controls (saccharin, amoxicillin) had little or no effect. Benchmark dose modeling showed that thigmotaxis was generally more sensitive than traditional locomotor activity endpoints. Overall, this multiplexed visual-acoustic thigmotaxis assay proved reproducible, scalable, and sensitive. In neurotoxicity testing this method could be used both as a stand-alone assay or as part of a broader behavioral NAM battery to assess potential effects on the vertebrate nervous system. This method provides a practical and ethical tool to improve chemical safety assessment both in ecotoxicology and human toxicology. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=62 SRC="FIGDIR/small/703464v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (23K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1ceea53org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@17a2a8borg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@17f16b1org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@aac24f_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Environmental Science & Technology
64 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
26.2%
2
Environment International
42 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.5%
3
Chemosphere
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.2%
4
Archives of Toxicology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.5%
50% of probability mass above
5
NeuroToxicology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.9%
6
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.4%
7
Toxicological Sciences
38 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.0%
8
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 41%
3.1%
9
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.9%
10
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
14 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
11
Environmental Research
46 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
12
Journal of Hazardous Materials
19 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
13
Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
14
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
15
ACS ES&T Water
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
16
Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
17
Environmental Health Perspectives
17 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
18
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
19
Environmental Pollution
35 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
20
Cell Reports Methods
141 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.5%
21
Analytical Chemistry
205 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%