Back

Not all West Nile virus lineages behave alike: vector competence and minimum infectious dose differences between lineages 1 and 2

Höller, P.; Sauer, F. G.; Lühken, R.; Becker, N.; Schmidt-Chanasit, J.; Jansen, S.; Heitmann, A.

2026-02-03 microbiology
10.64898/2026.02.03.700853 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The globally distributed arbovirus West Nile virus (WNV) continues to expand across Europe, with rising numbers of human cases and an increasingly broad geographic distribution. WNV is primarily transmitted by mosquitoes of the genus Culex. Out of nine WNV lineages, human pathogenicity has been clearly established for lineages 1 and 2, but differences in their transmission dynamics, such as minimal infectious dose and transmission efficiency, remain poorly understood. In this study, we investigated how viral lineage, mosquito species, and blood meal titer influence the vector competence of two primary WNV vectors from Europe, Cx. pipiens biotype pipiens and Cx. torrentium, as well as the invasive mosquito species Aedes albopictus. Female mosquitoes were fed with increasing blood meal titers containing either of the WNV lineages. After an incubation period of 14 days at a mean temperature of 24{degrees}C, mosquito body titers were quantified, and the presence of infectious viral particles in the saliva was assessed. Our results revealed clear differences between the two lineages. Lineage 2 resulted in higher transmission efficiencies across all three species and required lower infectious doses to cause transmission. Among the tested species, Cx. torrentium proved to be a highly competent vector (max. transmission efficiency = 30%, minimum infectious dose = 105 TCID50/mL), despite its underrepresentation in research. These findings provide detailed insights into how viral lineage, mosquito species, and blood meal titer might shape WNV transmission, informing future risk assessments and efforts to mitigate WNV transmission in Europe.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
378 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
12.2%
2
Viruses
318 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
9.1%
3
mSphere
281 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
6.8%
4
Parasites & Vectors
57 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.3%
5
Journal of Virology
456 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.3%
6
Journal of Medical Entomology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
7
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.9%
8
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
60 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
9
Journal of General Virology
46 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
10
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 38%
3.6%
11
PLOS Pathogens
721 papers in training set
Top 4%
3.0%
12
Emerging Microbes & Infections
74 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.6%
13
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 6%
2.6%
14
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.3%
15
Emerging Infectious Diseases
103 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
16
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.9%
17
Ticks and Tick-borne Diseases
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
18
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
301 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
19
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.6%
20
Medical and Veterinary Entomology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
21
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
22
One Health
29 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
23
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
24
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
98 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
25
Virus Evolution
140 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
26
Journal of Virological Methods
36 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
27
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 64%
0.7%
28
Pathogens
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%