Back

Effects of chronic angiotensin inhibition on exercise cardiovascular adaptations

Labrador-Sanchez, I.; Moreno-Cabanas, A.; Gonzalez-Garcia, L.; Mora-Gonzalez, D.; Mora-Rodriguez, R.; Morales-Palomo, F.

2026-02-05 cardiovascular medicine
10.64898/2026.02.03.26345524 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundAngiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) are commonly prescribed alongside exercise to manage hypertension in individuals with metabolic syndrome (MetS). However, their potential to interfere with exercise-induced physiological adaptations remains unclear. MethodsIn this prospective, parallel-group study, 62 sedentary obese adults with MetS completed a 16-week supervised high-intensity interval training (HIIT) program. Participants were either chronically medicated with ACEi or ARBs (antihypertensive medication group, AHM, n=27) or a non-medicated control group (CONTROL, n=35). Primary outcomes included changes in resting and graded exercise blood pressure, MetS components, and cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF). ResultsBoth groups exhibited significant comparable improvements (all p time x group > 0.05) in cardiometabolic health (MetS Z-score; AHM -0.22{+/-}0.42; CONTROL - 0.30{+/-}0.33; p time < 0.001) and CRF (VO2MAX: AHM 3.9{+/-}2.1; CONTROL 5.0{+/-}3.1 mL{middle dot}kg-{superscript 1}{middle dot}min-{superscript 1}; p time = 0.003). Resting blood pressure decreased similarly in both groups (Mean Arterial Pressure: AHM -4.2{+/-}8.7; CONTROL -6.5{+/-}6.3 mmHg; both p time = 0.005; p time x group > 0.05). Additionally, antihypertensive medication did not interfere with the maximal (MAP; p time = 0.008) and submaximal (DBP; p time = 0.047) blood pressure exercise responses following training with no significant time x group interaction (both p > 0.05) ConclusionsChronic treatment with angiotensin antagonist medication to treat hypertension does not restrain the effects of supervised HIIT program on improving cardiovascular function, cardiorespiratory fitness, or reducing the components of MetS. Our findings support aerobic exercise training as an effective nonpharmacological co-therapy for hypertensive patients treated with angiotensin antagonists.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
10.5%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 19%
10.1%
3
Open Heart
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.1%
4
American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
5
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
49 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
6.4%
6
Hypertension
32 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.3%
7
European Journal of Preventive Cardiology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.2%
50% of probability mass above
8
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.0%
9
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
10
The American Journal of Cardiology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.6%
11
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.1%
12
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 47%
2.4%
13
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
14
BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care
15 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
15
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
16
Atherosclerosis
29 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.3%
17
Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology
65 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
18
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.2%
19
Obesity
19 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
20
Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism
17 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
21
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
22
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
23
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
24
Circulation
66 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
25
European Heart Journal
16 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
26
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 17%
0.6%
27
Pilot and Feasibility Studies
12 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%
28
The Journal of Physiology
134 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%